Nowak Bernhard, Mueffling Theda V, Caspari Kai, Hartung Joerg
Institute for Food Quality and Food Safety, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, Hannover, Germany.
Vet Microbiol. 2006 Oct 31;117(2-4):219-28. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Jul 11.
Various methods have been described in the literature for the detection of virulent Yersinia enterocolitica in pigs. The risk factors for pig herd contamination have yet to be determined. The objective of this study was to validate a sensitive method for the detection of Y. enterocolitica and to describe the distribution of the bacteria in pigs at slaughter from conventional and alternative ("organic") housing systems. First, samples were collected from tonsils, caecum with caecal contents, and the caecal lymph nodes of 60 slaughter pigs. These samples were used to compare the sensitivity of six different laboratory culture methods either in common use or described in the literature with that of a polymerase chain reaction with two primer pairs (multiplex PCR). Then, only PCR was used to examine tonsils, caecum and caecal lymph nodes from two groups of slaughter pigs: 210 from six conventional fattening farms and 200 from three with alternative housing. The results of the multiplex PCR were positive in 28 cases. All culture methods proved inferior to PCR in sensitivity. In the second part of the study, PCR detected 36 (18%) positive pigs from alternative housing and 60 (29%) from conventional housing (p<0.05). The highest rate of Y. enterocolitica contamination was found in tonsils (11% alternative, 22% conventional; p<0.05), followed by caecum (5%, 11%) and lymph nodes (2%, 7%). The housing system appears to be one important factor in the prevalence of this common pathogen in pig herds, as we found important differences between the two systems studied here. In the conventional system, the main risk factors appeared to be sourcing pigs from different pig suppliers, use of commercial feed and transportation to slaughter.
文献中已描述了多种检测猪体内致病性小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌的方法。猪群感染的风险因素尚未确定。本研究的目的是验证一种检测小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌的灵敏方法,并描述来自传统和替代(“有机”)饲养系统的待屠宰猪体内该细菌的分布情况。首先,从60头待屠宰猪的扁桃体、含盲肠内容物的盲肠以及盲肠淋巴结采集样本。这些样本用于比较六种常用或文献中描述的不同实验室培养方法与两种引物对的聚合酶链反应(多重聚合酶链反应)的灵敏度。然后,仅使用聚合酶链反应检测两组待屠宰猪的扁桃体、盲肠和盲肠淋巴结:来自六个传统育肥场的210头猪和来自三个替代饲养场的200头猪。多重聚合酶链反应结果在28例中呈阳性。所有培养方法在灵敏度上均证明不如聚合酶链反应。在研究的第二部分中,聚合酶链反应检测到来自替代饲养场的36头(18%)阳性猪和来自传统饲养场的60头(29%)阳性猪(p<0.05)。小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌污染率最高的是扁桃体(替代饲养场11%,传统饲养场22%;p<0.05),其次是盲肠(5%,11%)和淋巴结(2%,7%)。饲养系统似乎是猪群中这种常见病原体流行的一个重要因素,因为我们在此研究的两个系统之间发现了重要差异。在传统系统中,主要风险因素似乎是从不同的猪供应商采购猪、使用商业饲料以及运输至屠宰场。