Buccisano F, Maurillo L, Gattei V, Del Poeta G, Del Principe M I, Cox M C, Panetta P, Consalvo M Irno, Mazzone C, Neri B, Ottaviani L, Fraboni D, Tamburini A, Lo-Coco F, Amadori S, Venditti A
Department of Biopatologia e Diagnostica per Immagini, Policlinico Tor Vergata and Ospedale S Eugenio, Rome, Italy.
Leukemia. 2006 Oct;20(10):1783-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404313. Epub 2006 Jul 13.
We assessed by multiparametric flow cytometry the levels of minimal residual disease (MRD) in 100 adult patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) achieving complete remission after intensive chemotherapy. The aim of the study was to determine the optimal threshold, in terms of residual leukemic cells, and the time point of choice, that is, post-induction (post-Ind) or post-consolidation (post-Cons), able to better predict outcome. By applying the maximally selected log-rank statistics, the threshold discriminating MRD- from MRD+ cases was set at 3.5 x 10(-4) residual leukemic cells, a level that allowed the identification of distinct subgroups of patients, both at post-Ind and post-Cons time points. Post-Cons MRD- patients had a superior outcome in terms of relapse rate, overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (P<0.001, for all comparisons), regardless of the MRD status after induction. In particular, patients entering MRD negativity only after consolidation showed the same outcome as those achieving early negativity after induction. Multivariate analysis, including karyotype, age, MDR1 phenotype, post-Ind and post-Cons MRD levels, indicated that the post-Cons MRD status independently affected relapse rate, OS and RFS (P<0.001, for all comparisons).
(1) the threshold of 3.5 x 10(-4) is valid in discriminating risk categories in adult AML and (2) post-Cons MRD assessment is critical to predict disease outcome.
我们通过多参数流式细胞术评估了100例急性髓性白血病(AML)成年患者在强化化疗后达到完全缓解时的微小残留病(MRD)水平。本研究的目的是确定就残留白血病细胞而言的最佳阈值以及能够更好预测预后的选择时间点,即诱导后(诱导后)或巩固后(巩固后)。通过应用最大选择对数秩统计,区分MRD阴性与MRD阳性病例的阈值设定为3.5×10(-4)个残留白血病细胞,这一水平能够在诱导后和巩固后时间点识别出不同的患者亚组。巩固后MRD阴性的患者在复发率、总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)方面具有更好的预后(所有比较P<0.001),无论诱导后的MRD状态如何。特别是,仅在巩固后进入MRD阴性的患者与诱导后早期达到阴性的患者具有相同的预后。多变量分析包括核型、年龄、MDR1表型、诱导后和巩固后MRD水平,表明巩固后MRD状态独立影响复发率、OS和RFS(所有比较P<0.001)。
(1)3.5×10(-4)的阈值在区分成人AML的风险类别方面有效,(2)巩固后MRD评估对于预测疾病预后至关重要。