Mearin Fermín, García-González María-Asunción, Strunk Michael, Zárate Natalia, Malagelada Juán-Ramón, Lanas Angel
Institute of Functional and Motor Digestive Disorders, Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;101(9):1979-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00762.x. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
Our group previously reported the absence of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in the gastroesophageal junction of patients with achalasia. NOS exists in three distinct isoforms: neuronal NOS (nNOS), endothelial NOS (eNOS), and inducible isoform (iNOS). Some studies have shown that NO production is regulated by NOS polymorphisms.
To assess whether some functional polymorphisms in the nNOS, iNOS, or eNOS genes are involved in susceptibility to suffer from achalasia.
Genomic DNA from 80 unrelated Spanish Caucasian patients with sporadic achalasia and 144 healthy subjects matched for age (+/-5 yr) and gender was typed by PCR and RFLP methods for the 27-bp variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) polymorphism in intron 4 of the eNOS gene, a CA microsatellite repeat and a Nla III (C-->T) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) in exon 29 of the nNOS gene, and two nucleotide substitutions located in exon 16 (C-->T) and exon 22 (G-->A) of the iNOS gene.
No significant differences in carriage, genotype, and allele frequencies of the nNOS, iNOS, or eNOS gene polymorphisms were found between patients with achalasia and controls. Individuals homozygous for genotype iNOS22A/A tended to be more frequent in achalasia (20%vs 11%, odds ratio [OR] 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-3.59, p= 0.09) as were those homozygous for the rare eNOS4a allele (6.2%vs 1.4%, OR 4.5, 95% CI 0.89-22.67, p= 0.1) although the difference did not reach statistical significance. No differences in genotype and allele distribution were found with respect to epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with achalasia.
Our data suggest that NOS gene polymorphisms are not involved in the susceptibility to and nature of the clinical course of sporadic achalasia. However, studies in a greater number of patients are required to analyze the tendency toward a higher prevalence of genotypes iNOS22A/A and eNOS4a4a.
我们的研究小组之前报道,贲门失弛缓症患者的胃食管交界处不存在一氧化氮合酶(NOS)。NOS有三种不同的亚型:神经元型NOS(nNOS)、内皮型NOS(eNOS)和诱导型亚型(iNOS)。一些研究表明,一氧化氮的产生受NOS多态性的调控。
评估nNOS、iNOS或eNOS基因中的某些功能性多态性是否与贲门失弛缓症的易感性有关。
采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)和限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)方法,对80例散发性贲门失弛缓症的西班牙白种人患者以及144例年龄(±5岁)和性别相匹配的健康对照者的基因组DNA进行分型,检测eNOS基因第4内含子中27bp可变串联重复序列(VNTR)多态性、nNOS基因第29外显子中的CA微卫星重复序列以及Nla III(C→T)限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP),以及iNOS基因第16外显子(C→T)和第22外显子(G→A)中的两个核苷酸替换。
贲门失弛缓症患者与对照组在nNOS、iNOS或eNOS基因多态性的携带情况、基因型和等位基因频率方面未发现显著差异。iNOS22A/A基因型的纯合个体在贲门失弛缓症患者中似乎更为常见(20%对11%,优势比[OR]1.79,95%置信区间[CI]0.89 - 3.59,p = 0.09),罕见的eNOS4a等位基因的纯合个体也是如此(6.2%对1.4%,OR 4.5,95% CI 0.89 - 22.67,p = 0.1),尽管差异未达到统计学显著性。在贲门失弛缓症患者的流行病学和临床特征方面,未发现基因型和等位基因分布存在差异。
我们的数据表明,NOS基因多态性与散发性贲门失弛缓症的易感性及临床病程的性质无关。然而,需要对更多患者进行研究,以分析iNOS22A/A和eNOS4a4a基因型较高患病率的趋势。