Aghai Zubair H, Saslow Judy G, Nakhla Tarek, Milcarek Barry, Hart James, Lawrysh-Plunkett Robyn, Stahl Gary, Habib Robert H, Pyon Kee H
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, The Children's Regional Hospital at Cooper University Hospital, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Camden, New Jersey 08103, USA.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006 Sep;41(9):875-81. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20461.
Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) is non-invasive respiratory support that delivers ventilator breaths via the nasal prongs. We hypothesized that SNIPPV is more effective than nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in premature neonates due to decreased work of breathing (WOB). Fifteen infants (BW: 1,367 +/- 325 g, GA: 29.5 +/- 2.4 weeks) were studied on (a) NCPAP at 5 cmH(2)O (NCPAP5) and (b) three increasing SNIPPV settings achieved by NCPAP5 with additional delivered peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) of 10, 12, and 14 cmH(2)O. Tidal volumes and transpulmonary pressures were estimated via calibrated respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) and esophageal pressures, respectively. Inspiratory (WOB(insp)), resistive (RWOB), and elastic (WOB(E)) components of WOB were calculated using standard methods. Compared to NCPAP5, (a) WOB(insp) and RWOB were significantly lower with SNIPPV12, and were similarly lower with SNIPPV14 and (b) WOB(E) was significantly lower only with SNIPPV14. WOB components did not differ significantly for the three SNIPPV settings. Tidal volume, respiratory rate (RR), minute ventilation, compliance, and phase angle were similar for all four measurements. In conclusion, compared to NCPAP, the addition of ventilator-delivered PIP during SNIPPV decreases WOB in premature infants.
同步鼻间歇正压通气(SNIPPV)是一种通过鼻导管输送呼吸机呼吸的无创呼吸支持方式。我们假设,由于呼吸功(WOB)降低,SNIPPV在早产儿中比鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)更有效。对15名婴儿(体重:1367±325克,胎龄:29.5±2.4周)进行了研究,研究内容包括:(a)5厘米水柱的NCPAP(NCPAP5),以及(b)通过NCPAP5实现的三种逐渐增加的SNIPPV设置,额外输送的吸气峰压(PIP)分别为10、12和14厘米水柱。分别通过校准的呼吸感应体积描记法(RIP)和食管压力来估计潮气量和跨肺压。使用标准方法计算WOB的吸气(WOB(insp))、阻力(RWOB)和弹性(WOB(E))分量。与NCPAP5相比,(a)SNIPPV12时WOB(insp)和RWOB显著降低,SNIPPV14时同样降低;(b)仅SNIPPV14时WOB(E)显著降低。三种SNIPPV设置下的WOB分量无显著差异。四种测量的潮气量、呼吸频率(RR)、分钟通气量、顺应性和相位角相似。总之,与NCPAP相比,SNIPPV期间增加呼吸机输送的PIP可降低早产儿的WOB。