Orita Hideo, Inada Yasuji
Research Institute for Computational Sciences (RICS), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central 5, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8565, Japan.
J Phys Chem B. 2005 Dec 1;109(47):22469-75. doi: 10.1021/jp052583a.
Adsorption of CO on Pt(211) and Pt(311) surfaces has been investigated by the density functional theory (DFT) method (periodic DMol3) with full geometry optimization. Adsorption energies, structures, and C-O stretching vibrational frequencies are studied by considering multiple possible adsorption sites and comparing them with the experimental data. The calculated C-O stretching frequencies agree well with the experimental ones, and precise determination of adsorption sites can be carried out. For Pt(211), CO adsorbs at the atop site on the step edge at low coverage, but CO adsorbs at the atop and bridge sites simultaneously on both the step edge and the terrace with further increasing CO coverage. The present results interpret the reflection adsorption infrared (RAIR) spectra of Brown and co-workers very well from low to high coverage. For Pt(311), CO adsorbs also at the atop site on the step edge at low coverage. The lifting of reconstruction by CO adsorption occurs also for Pt(311), whereas the energy gain for lifting the reconstruction of the Pt(311) surface is smaller than that for Pt(110). The largest difference between the stepped Pt(211)/Pt(311) and Pt(110) surfaces is the occupation on the edge sites at higher coverage. For the stepped surfaces, the bridge site begins to be occupied at higher coverage, whereas the atop site is always occupied for the Pt(110) surface.
采用密度泛函理论(DFT)方法(周期性DMol3)并进行全几何优化,研究了CO在Pt(211)和Pt(311)表面的吸附情况。通过考虑多个可能的吸附位点并与实验数据进行比较,研究了吸附能、结构和C-O伸缩振动频率。计算得到的C-O伸缩频率与实验值吻合良好,并且可以精确确定吸附位点。对于Pt(211),在低覆盖度下,CO吸附在台阶边缘的顶位,但随着CO覆盖度的进一步增加,CO同时吸附在台阶边缘和台面上的顶位和桥位。目前的结果很好地解释了Brown及其同事从低覆盖度到高覆盖度的反射吸附红外(RAIR)光谱。对于Pt(311),在低覆盖度下,CO也吸附在台阶边缘的顶位。CO吸附导致Pt(311)表面重构的解除,而Pt(311)表面重构解除的能量增益小于Pt(110)。阶梯状的Pt(211)/Pt(311)与Pt(110)表面之间最大的差异在于高覆盖度下边缘位点的占据情况。对于阶梯状表面,在高覆盖度下桥位开始被占据,而对于Pt(110)表面,顶位始终被占据。