Adam Barry D
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Windsor, Canada.
Cult Health Sex. 2005 Jul-Aug;7(4):333-46. doi: 10.1080/13691050500100773.
This paper analyses on the discourses employed by a subset of gay and bisexual men who no longer practise protected sex more than twenty years into the HIV epidemic. In-depth interviews with 102 men in Toronto are used to examine the moral reasoning of those for whom the language of barebacking provides a shared set of accounts and tacit understandings for unprotected sex. Barebacking raises some of the central issues of contemporary theory around risk, responsibility, and ethics, and poses new challenges to HIV prevention policy as barebacking discourses adapt some of the major tenets of neoliberal ideology by combining notions of informed consent, contractual interaction, free market choice, and responsibility in new ways. At the same time, interviews with barebackers reveal competing and contradictory discourses that suggest new avenues of engagement for HIV prevention initiatives.
本文分析了在艾滋病流行二十多年后不再采取安全性行为的一部分男同性恋者和双性恋者所使用的话语。通过对多伦多102名男性进行深入访谈,来考察那些使用“无保护肛交”语言为无保护性行为提供一套共同说法和默契理解的人的道德推理。“无保护肛交”引发了当代理论中一些围绕风险、责任和伦理的核心问题,并对艾滋病预防政策提出了新挑战,因为“无保护肛交”话语通过以新的方式结合知情同意、契约互动、自由市场选择和责任等新自由主义意识形态的一些主要原则,对其进行了改编。与此同时,对“无保护肛交者”的访谈揭示了相互竞争和矛盾的话语,这些话语为艾滋病预防倡议指明了新的参与途径。