Clarke L
Faculty of Health, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, UK.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2006 Aug;13(4):388-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.00995.x.
The problematic nature of defining nursing is examined. Contrasts are set out in respect of the work of different grades of practitioner and how these do or do not constitute nursing care. A concept of caring and caring profession is utilized as a backdrop by which it is argued that caring can be defended as an ethical position independently of its objects of care. The paper asserts the existence of different perspectives within mental health nursing and demonstrates how these are influenced by extraneous forces. It concludes by (1) defending universal moral rules that operate independently of situations or the objects to which they apply and (2) that the usefulness of invoking a nursing identity may be less rather than more illuminative in exposing what mental health (psychiatric) 'nursing' is.
本文探讨了界定护理工作的难题。文中阐述了不同级别从业者工作的差异,以及这些工作如何构成或不构成护理服务。文章以关爱和关爱职业的概念为背景,认为关爱可作为一种伦理立场独立于其关爱对象而存在。本文主张心理健康护理存在不同观点,并展示了这些观点如何受到外部力量的影响。文章最后得出结论:(1)维护独立于具体情境或适用对象的普遍道德规则;(2)在揭示心理健康(精神科)“护理”的本质方面,援引护理身份的作用可能较小而非更大。