Allen-Ramey Felicia C, Markson Leona E, Riedel Aylin A, Sajjan Shiva, Weiss Kevin B
Merck & Co. Inc., West Point, PA 19486, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Aug;22(8):1453-61. doi: 10.1185/030079906X115522.
To examine the impact of controller monotherapy with montelukast or fluticasone on asthma-related health care resource use among children aged 2-14 years old.
A retrospective claims-based analysis of asthmatic children, 2-14 years old, receiving a prescription (index) for montelukast or fluticasone between January 1, 1999 and June 30, 2000 was conducted. Children were matched by age and propensity score to obtain comparable treatment groups. The propensity score was derived using patient demographics, pre-existing respiratory conditions, and asthma-related pharmacy and health service utilization (i.e. ambulatory visits, emergency department visits and hospitalizations). Claims for asthma-related emergent care and medication use were examined for the 12-month periods before and after the index prescription. Treatment group comparisons of asthma-related resource use were conducted for the total pediatric population and separately for children 2-5 years and 6-14 years. Persistent controller medication use was assessed at 6 and 12 months post-index.
A total of 2034 children were matched (1017 in each treatment group). Post-index rates of asthma-related resource use were similar among children treated with montelukast or fluticasone. Among children 2-5 years old, fewer emergency department visits were observed with montelukast versus fluticasone (relative risk = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.96); no significant difference was observed among children 6-14 years old. No significant differences between montelukast and fluticasone cohorts in hospitalizations or rescue medication fills were noted in either age group. Evidence of at least one medication refill was significantly greater with montelukast at both 6 and 12 months post-index.
Similar levels of resource use were achieved by children 2-14 years initiating montelukast or fluticasone, as indicated by use of asthma-related emergent care and rescue/acute medications. Subgroup analyses suggest a differential effect of age on the relationship between treatment and asthma-related resource use, with children 2-5 years observed to have less resource use while on montelukast.
探讨使用孟鲁司特或氟替卡松进行单一控制治疗对2至14岁儿童哮喘相关医疗资源使用情况的影响。
对1999年1月1日至2000年6月30日期间接受孟鲁司特或氟替卡松处方(索引)治疗的2至14岁哮喘儿童进行基于索赔记录的回顾性分析。根据年龄和倾向得分对儿童进行匹配,以获得可比的治疗组。倾向得分是根据患者人口统计学、既往呼吸系统疾病以及哮喘相关的药房和医疗服务利用情况(即门诊就诊、急诊科就诊和住院情况)得出的。对索引处方前后12个月期间与哮喘相关的紧急护理和药物使用索赔进行了检查。对整个儿科人群以及分别对2至5岁和6至14岁的儿童进行了哮喘相关资源使用的治疗组比较。在索引后6个月和12个月评估持续使用控制药物的情况。
总共匹配了2034名儿童(每个治疗组1017名)。接受孟鲁司特或氟替卡松治疗的儿童在索引后哮喘相关资源使用发生率相似。在2至5岁的儿童中,与氟替卡松相比,使用孟鲁司特时观察到的急诊科就诊次数较少(相对风险 = 0.52,95%置信区间[CI]:0.28 - 0.96);在6至14岁的儿童中未观察到显著差异。在两个年龄组中,孟鲁司特组和氟替卡松组在住院或急救药物配药方面均未发现显著差异。在索引后6个月和12个月,孟鲁司特组至少有一次药物再填充的证据明显更多。
开始使用孟鲁司特或氟替卡松的2至14岁儿童在哮喘相关紧急护理和急救/急性药物使用方面所达到的资源使用水平相似。亚组分析表明年龄对治疗与哮喘相关资源使用之间的关系有不同影响,观察到2至5岁儿童在使用孟鲁司特时资源使用较少。