Suppr超能文献

普通牙科实践中使用稳定牙合夹板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱症:一年随访

The treatment of temporomandibular disorders with stabilizing splints in general dental practice: one-year follow-up.

作者信息

Wassell Robert W, Adams Nigel, Kelly Peter J

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, University of Newcastle, England.

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Aug;137(8):1089-98; quiz 1168-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0347.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors evaluated temporomandibular disorder (TMD) outcomes in general dental practice one year after treatment with stabilizing splints (SS) or nonoccluding control splints (CS).

METHODS

Seventy-two randomly allocated subjects completed initial treatment. The outcomes measures were a pain visual analog scale (VAS), muscle tenderness, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) tenderness, interincisal opening, TMJ clicks and headaches. After initial treatment, 81 percent of the subjects were found to have been treated satisfactorily. The dentists referred the remaining subjects to a dental hospital. At one year, the authors recalled 52 of the original subjects for evaluation.

RESULTS

Improvements after initial treatment were maintained at one year for all outcomes, except for TMJ clicking, which returned to pretreatment levels. Eighty-one percent of the subjects rated their treatment as either good or excellent in reducing jaw pain. The authors found that subjects were aware of more of their TMJ clicks than dentists observed at the one-year clinical examination, but most subjects thought their clicking or the associated pain had been reduced. Fifty-five percent subjects had used their splints in the previous six months, but only 31 percent of these had done so daily. There were no significant differences between splint groups.

CONCLUSION

At one year, a good response to TMD treatment in general practice had been maintained, but many subjects still had clicking TMJs.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Trained dentists can manage TMD satisfactorily, with only a small proportion of patients needing specialist attention.

摘要

背景

作者评估了在使用稳定型咬合板(SS)或非咬合对照咬合板(CS)治疗一年后,普通牙科诊所中颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)的治疗效果。

方法

72名随机分配的受试者完成了初始治疗。观察指标包括疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、肌肉压痛、颞下颌关节(TMJ)压痛、切牙间开口度、TMJ弹响和头痛情况。初始治疗后,发现81%的受试者治疗效果满意。牙医将其余受试者转诊至牙科医院。一年后,作者召回了52名原受试者进行评估。

结果

除TMJ弹响恢复到治疗前水平外,所有观察指标在初始治疗后的改善情况在一年时均得以维持。81%的受试者对治疗在减轻颌部疼痛方面的评价为良好或优秀。作者发现,在一年的临床检查中,受试者自身察觉到的TMJ弹响比牙医观察到的更多,但大多数受试者认为他们的弹响或相关疼痛有所减轻。55%的受试者在过去六个月中使用过咬合板,但其中只有31%的受试者每天都使用。两组咬合板之间无显著差异。

结论

一年时,普通牙科诊所中对TMD治疗的良好反应得以维持,但许多受试者的TMJ仍有弹响。

临床意义

经过培训的牙医能够令人满意地管理TMD,只有一小部分患者需要专科治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验