Muntlin Asa, Gunningberg Lena, Carlsson Marianne
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Section of Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden.
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Aug;15(8):1045-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01368.x.
This paper reports a study to identify patient's perceptions of quality of care at an emergency department and areas for quality improvement.
Patients are not always satisfied with the care received at emergency departments. More attention needs to be paid to the specific needs and expectations of the non-urgent group of patients, who make up the majority of attenders at many emergency departments. Nurses' and physicians' perceptions about good quality of care do not always agree with patients' perceptions. Instruments measuring patient satisfaction have often been focused on inpatient treatment.
A prospective, descriptive survey design was adopted and the study took place in one emergency department at a Swedish university hospital in 2002. The participants were 99 women and 101 men, with an average age of 51 years. The emergency department version of the questionnaire Quality from the Patient's Perspective was used for data collection.
Patients estimated quality of care at the emergency department as fairly good, but there were areas in need of improvement. A high percent of inadequate quality was related to the environment in the emergency department. About 20% of patients reported that they did not receive effective pain relief. More than 20% estimated that nurses did not show an interest in their life situation and patients did not receive useful information on self-care and about which physician was responsible for their medical care.
The use of a research-based instrument gave valuable information for quality improvement in clinical practice. Many of the identified areas for quality improvement are related to nursing care. Therefore, the importance of nursing care in the emergency department should be highlighted to nurses and physicians and they also need to be more attentive to the need of the individual patient.
Identifying areas for quality improvements are important, to know where to take action. These findings may facilitate the work with changing attitudes and working routines, which are needed to deliver effective care and to improve patients' perceptions of quality of care at emergency departments.
本文报告一项旨在确定患者对急诊科护理质量的看法以及质量改进领域的研究。
患者对在急诊科接受的护理并不总是满意。需要更多关注非紧急患者群体的特定需求和期望,他们在许多急诊科的就诊者中占大多数。护士和医生对优质护理的看法并不总是与患者的看法一致。衡量患者满意度的工具往往侧重于住院治疗。
采用前瞻性描述性调查设计,该研究于2002年在瑞典一家大学医院的一个急诊科进行。参与者为99名女性和101名男性,平均年龄51岁。使用从患者角度看质量的问卷急诊版进行数据收集。
患者估计急诊科的护理质量相当不错,但仍有需要改进的领域。相当一部分质量不足与急诊科的环境有关。约20%的患者报告未得到有效的疼痛缓解。超过20%的患者估计护士对他们的生活状况不感兴趣,并且患者未获得关于自我护理以及哪位医生负责其医疗护理的有用信息。
使用基于研究的工具为临床实践中的质量改进提供了有价值的信息。许多确定的质量改进领域与护理有关。因此,应向护士和医生强调急诊科护理的重要性,他们还需要更加关注个体患者的需求。
确定质量改进领域很重要,以便知道从何处采取行动。这些发现可能有助于改变态度和工作常规的工作,而这是提供有效护理并改善患者对急诊科护理质量看法所必需的。