Suppr超能文献

观察者评定的述情障碍中情绪效价评定与斯特鲁普干扰的分离

Dissociation of rated emotional valence and Stroop interference in observer-rated alexithymia.

作者信息

Mueller Jochen, Alpers Georg W, Reim Norman

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2006 Aug;61(2):261-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.02.017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate a theoretically predicted deficit in the capacity to process emotions in alexithymia. The performance of patients high and that of patients low in alexithymia was tested in a computerized emotional Stroop task.

METHODS

Reaction times of high and low self- and observer-rated alexithymia groups of 45 psychosomatic inpatients were compared. The task was to name the color of emotionally neutral, positive, negative, and bodily-symptom words as quickly as possible.

RESULTS

As expected, patients rated high versus those rated low in alexithymia by observers (but not by self-rating) showed a significantly lesser emotional bias for emotionally negative words and bodily-symptom words but did not differ in their explicit rating of the emotional valence of the words.

CONCLUSION

This dissociation between explicit and implicit reactions to the emotional valence of word stimuli suggests that patients high in alexithymia spontaneously allocate less processing resources to negative information.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是调查在述情障碍中处理情绪能力的理论预测缺陷。在一项计算机化情绪斯特鲁普任务中测试了述情障碍程度高和低的患者的表现。

方法

比较了45名心身疾病住院患者中自我和观察者评定的述情障碍程度高和低的两组的反应时间。任务是尽快说出情绪中性、积极、消极和身体症状词汇的颜色。

结果

正如预期的那样,观察者评定(而非自我评定)述情障碍程度高的患者与程度低的患者相比,对情绪消极词汇和身体症状词汇的情绪偏向明显较小,但他们对词汇情绪效价的明确评定没有差异。

结论

对词汇刺激情绪效价的明确和隐性反应之间的这种分离表明,述情障碍程度高的患者会自发地将较少的处理资源分配给负面信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验