Foglia Manzillo V, Oliva G, Pagano A, Manna L, Maroli M, Gradoni L
Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche Veterinarie, Università di Napoli 'Federico II', Via F. Delpino 1, 80137 Napoli, Italy.
Vet Parasitol. 2006 Nov 30;142(1-2):142-5. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.06.029. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
A 2-year field study on kennelled stray dogs living in a highly endemic area of leishmaniasis was designed to evaluate whether deltamethrin-impregnated collars (Scalibor) Protector Band) could confer protection against leishmaniasis in this peculiar setting, and to assess differences in clinical outcomes between collared and uncollared dogs. A cohort of 120 clinically healthy and Leishmania-seronegative dogs was enrolled, 50% of which were collared before the 2003 transmission season, and then re-collared before the subsequent season. Collared and uncollared animals were allowed to live with infected dogs in same groups within the kennel. Follow-up included serological (IFAT) assessment twice a year with parasitological Leishmania confirmation, and clinical evaluation performed every 3 months on seroconverted dogs from both groups. Collar losses during the two seasons were high (35%). About 50% of enrolled dogs were lost at follow-up because of death or they were moved to other locations. After the 2003 season, cross-sectional serological examinations tested positive in 5 out of 44 collared animals (11.4%) and in 14 out of 34 controls (41.2%), with 72.3% estimated protection (P<0.005). After the 2004 season, 7/31 seronegative collared dogs seroconverted (22.6%) compared with 7/17 seronegative controls (41.2%), with 45.1% protection (P=0.15). At the end of the study, the cumulative rate of protection was 50.8% (P=0.005). At the clinical evaluation of 21 seroconverted dogs from both groups, canine leishmaniasis signs were significantly more frequent (90% versus 36%, P=0.017) and rapidly progressive in uncollared than in collared dogs. Reasons for such partial clinical protection in collared dogs may be found in the vector anti-feeding effect of protector bands, resulting in a lower number of infectious bites and, probably, in the reduction of antigenic stimuli necessary to shift toward a non-protective immune response.
一项针对生活在利什曼病高度流行地区犬舍中的流浪犬进行的为期两年的实地研究,旨在评估含有溴氰菊酯的项圈(Scalibor保护带)在这种特殊环境下是否能预防利什曼病,并评估佩戴项圈和未佩戴项圈的犬在临床结果上的差异。招募了一组120只临床健康且利什曼原虫血清学检测呈阴性的犬,其中50%在2003年传播季节前佩戴项圈,随后在下一季前再次佩戴。佩戴项圈和未佩戴项圈的动物被允许与感染犬在犬舍内同组生活。随访包括每年两次血清学(间接荧光抗体试验)评估并进行利什曼原虫寄生虫学确诊,以及对两组血清转化犬每3个月进行一次临床评估。两个季节中项圈丢失率很高(35%)。约50%登记的犬在随访期间因死亡或被转移到其他地方而丢失。2003年季节后,44只佩戴项圈的动物中有5只(11.4%)横断面血清学检查呈阳性,34只对照中有14只(41.2%)呈阳性,估计保护率为72.3%(P<0.005)。2004年季节后,31只血清学阴性佩戴项圈的犬中有7只血清转化(22.6%),而17只血清学阴性对照中有7只(41.2%),保护率为45.1%(P=0.15)。研究结束时,累积保护率为50.8%(P=0.005)。在对两组21只血清转化犬的临床评估中,未佩戴项圈的犬出现犬利什曼病体征的频率显著更高(90%对36%,P=0.017),且进展比佩戴项圈的犬更快。佩戴项圈的犬出现这种部分临床保护的原因可能在于保护带对媒介的拒食作用,导致感染性叮咬次数减少,并且可能减少了转向非保护性免疫反应所需的抗原刺激。