Pfammatter Mario, Junghan Ulrich Martin, Brenner Hans Dieter
Department of Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Psychiatry, Laupenstrasse 49, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Schizophr Bull. 2006 Oct;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S64-80. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbl030. Epub 2006 Aug 11.
Over the past years, evidence for the efficacy of psychological therapies in schizophrenia has been summarized in a series of meta-analyses. The present contribution aims to provide a descriptive survey of the evidence for the efficacy of psychological therapies as derived from these meta-analyses and to supplement them by selected findings from an own recent meta-analysis. Relevant meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials were identified by searching several electronic databases and by hand searching of reference lists. In order to compare the findings of the existing meta-analyses, the reported effect sizes were extracted and transformed into a uniform effect size measure where possible. For the own meta-analysis, weighted mean effect size differences between comparison groups regarding various types of outcomes were estimated. Their significance was tested by confidence intervals, and heterogeneity tests were applied to examine the consistency of the effects. From the available meta-analyses, social skills training, cognitive remediation, psychoeducational coping-oriented interventions with families and relatives, as well as cognitive behavioral therapy of persistent positive symptoms emerge as effective adjuncts to pharmacotherapy. Social skills training consistently effectuates the acquisition of social skills, cognitive remediation leads to short-term improvements in cognitive functioning, family interventions decrease relapse and hospitalization rates, and cognitive behavioral therapy results in a reduction of positive symptoms. These benefits seem to be accompanied by slight improvements in social functioning. However, open questions remain as to the specific therapeutic ingredients, to the synergistic effects, to the indication, as well as to the generalizability of the findings to routine care.
在过去几年中,一系列的荟萃分析总结了心理治疗在精神分裂症中的疗效证据。本论文旨在对这些荟萃分析得出的心理治疗疗效证据进行描述性综述,并通过作者近期一项荟萃分析的部分研究结果进行补充。通过检索多个电子数据库以及手工检索参考文献列表,确定了相关的荟萃分析和随机对照试验。为了比较现有荟萃分析的结果,提取了报告的效应量,并尽可能将其转换为统一的效应量指标。对于作者自己的荟萃分析,估计了比较组在各种类型结局方面的加权平均效应量差异。通过置信区间检验其显著性,并应用异质性检验来检查效应的一致性。从现有的荟萃分析来看,社交技能训练、认知康复、针对家庭和亲属的以应对为导向的心理教育干预以及对持续性阳性症状的认知行为疗法,均被证明是药物治疗的有效辅助手段。社交技能训练能够持续促进社交技能的习得,认知康复可带来认知功能的短期改善,家庭干预能降低复发率和住院率,认知行为疗法则可减少阳性症状。这些益处似乎伴随着社交功能的轻微改善。然而,在具体的治疗要素、协同效应、适应症以及这些研究结果对常规护理的可推广性等方面,仍存在一些悬而未决的问题。