Ahn J Y, Han I B, Kim T G, Yoon P H, Lee Y J, Lee B-H, Seo S H, Kim D I, Hong C K, Joo J Y
Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 146-92 Dogok-dong, Kangnamgu, Seoul 135-720, South Korea.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Aug;27(7):1514-20.
Endovascular treatment with stent placement or stent-assisted coiling was recently introduced as an alternative to parent artery occlusion in intracranial vertebral artery dissections. We describe the efficacy and limitations of this method.
Fourteen patients with intracranial vertebral artery dissection were treated with stent placement (10 patients) or stent-assisted coiling (4 patients). Double overlapping stents were deployed in 4 of 10 patients with stent placement alone. Angiographic follow-up at 6 to 12 months was available in 13 patients.
In 13 patients with dissecting aneurysm, immediate angiographic outcomes were complete occlusion (1 patient), nearly complete (2 patients), and incomplete (10 patients). Follow-up angiograms of 12 of these patients showed complete occlusion (6 patients) and incomplete (6 patients; 1 unstable and 5 stable). Complete occlusion rates in follow-up angiograms were superior in double stent placement (75%) or stent-assisted Guglielmi detachable coil (GDC) embolization to stent placement alone (0%). There were no instances of postprocedural ischemic attacks, new neurologic deficits, and no new minor or major strokes before patient discharge. On the modified Rankin scale applied in follow-up, all patients were assessed as functionally improved or of stable clinical status.
Intracranial vertebral artery dissections were acceptably treated with stent placement or stent-assisted coiling, and the patency could be preserved at follow-up. However, the efficiency of stent placement alone for intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm was limited. Stent-assisted coil embolization or double stent placements are a viable alternative for complete occlusion of dissecting aneurysms.
最近,血管内支架置入或支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗被引入,作为颅内椎动脉夹层动脉瘤母动脉闭塞术的替代方法。我们描述了该方法的疗效及局限性。
14例颅内椎动脉夹层动脉瘤患者接受了支架置入术(10例)或支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术(4例)。仅接受支架置入术的10例患者中,4例使用了双重叠支架。13例患者获得了6至12个月的血管造影随访结果。
13例夹层动脉瘤患者中,即刻血管造影结果为完全闭塞(1例)、近乎完全闭塞(2例)和不完全闭塞(10例)。其中12例患者的随访血管造影显示完全闭塞(6例)和不完全闭塞(6例;1例不稳定,5例稳定)。双支架置入术(75%)或支架辅助Guglielmi可脱卸弹簧圈(GDC)栓塞术的随访血管造影完全闭塞率高于单纯支架置入术(0%)。术后无缺血性发作、新的神经功能缺损,患者出院前也无新的轻微或严重卒中。在随访应用的改良Rankin量表中,所有患者功能均有改善或临床状态稳定。
颅内椎动脉夹层动脉瘤采用支架置入术或支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术治疗效果良好,随访时可保持通畅。然而,单纯支架置入术治疗颅内椎动脉夹层动脉瘤的效率有限。支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术或双支架置入术是完全闭塞夹层动脉瘤的可行替代方法。