Suppr超能文献

创伤性肺切除的手术管理与预后

Operative management and outcomes of traumatic lung resection.

作者信息

Martin Matthew J, McDonald Jerome M, Mullenix Philip S, Steele Scott R, Demetriades Demetrios

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA 98431-100, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Sep;203(3):336-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.05.009. Epub 2006 Jul 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To analyze the presentation, injury patterns, and outcomes among a large cohort of patients requiring lung resection for trauma, and to compare outcomes stratified by the extent of resection.

STUDY DESIGN

Review of all adult patients undergoing lung resections in the National Trauma Data Bank. Patients were categorized by extent of lung resection; wedge resection, lobectomy, or pneumonectomy. Patient factors, injury data, and outcomes were compared between groups using univariate and multivariable analysis for the entire sample, and after excluding patients with severe associated injuries.

RESULTS

There were 669 patients who had a lung resection after trauma identified for an overall prevalence of 0.08%, with 325 undergoing wedge resection (49%), 244 had a lobectomy (36%), and 100 underwent complete pneumonectomy (15%). Blunt mechanism was associated with worse outcomes in terms of prolonged hospital stay, complications, disability, and a trend toward higher mortality (38% versus 30%, p = 0.07). Patients undergoing pneumonectomy had a higher mortality (62%) and more complications (48%) compared with patients undergoing lobectomy (35% mortality, 33% complications) and wedge resection (22% and 8%, all p < 0.05). After excluding patients with severe associated injuries (head, abdomen, heart, great vessels), there were 535 patients with "isolated" lung injury. There was again a stepwise increase in mortality by extent of resection, 19% for wedge resection, 27% for lobectomy, and 53% for pneumonectomy. Extent of lung resection remained an independent predictor of mortality for both the entire sample and for patients with isolated lung injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung resection is infrequently required for traumatic injury, but carries substantial associated morbidity and mortality. The extent of lung resection is an independent predictor of hospital mortality, even after exclusion of patients with severe associated injuries. The worst outcomes were seen after complete pneumonectomy.

摘要

背景

分析大量因创伤需行肺切除术患者的临床表现、损伤模式及预后,并比较按切除范围分层的预后情况。

研究设计

回顾国家创伤数据库中所有接受肺切除术的成年患者。患者按肺切除范围分类;楔形切除术、肺叶切除术或全肺切除术。使用单变量和多变量分析比较整个样本组间以及排除严重合并伤患者后的患者因素、损伤数据和预后情况。

结果

共识别出669例创伤后行肺切除术的患者,总体患病率为0.08%,其中325例行楔形切除术(49%),244例行肺叶切除术(36%),100例行全肺切除术(15%)。钝性机制在住院时间延长、并发症、残疾方面与更差的预后相关,且有死亡率升高的趋势(38%对30%,p = 0.07)。与接受肺叶切除术(死亡率35%,并发症33%)和楔形切除术(分别为22%和8%,均p < 0.05)的患者相比,接受全肺切除术的患者死亡率更高(62%),并发症更多(48%)。排除严重合并伤(头部、腹部、心脏、大血管)患者后,有535例“孤立性”肺损伤患者。再次按切除范围观察到死亡率呈逐步上升,楔形切除术为19%,肺叶切除术为27%,全肺切除术为53%。肺切除范围仍是整个样本以及孤立性肺损伤患者死亡率的独立预测因素。

结论

创伤性损伤很少需要行肺切除术,但伴有大量相关的发病率和死亡率。肺切除范围是医院死亡率的独立预测因素,即使排除严重合并伤患者后也是如此。全肺切除术后预后最差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验