Suppr超能文献

三种示波法血压测量设备在儿童中相对于听诊法汞柱血压计的验证。

Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.

作者信息

Wong Sik-Nin, Tz Sung Rita Yn, Leung Lettie Chuk-Kwan

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, and Chinese University of Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Blood Press Monit. 2006 Oct;11(5):281-91. doi: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000209082.09623.b4.

Abstract

AIM

To validate Welch-Allyn Vital Sign Monitor, Dinamap Procare-120 and Datascope Accutorr Plus against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children aged 5-15 years old according to the International Protocol of European Society of Hypertension adapted for validation in children.

METHOD

One hundred and thirty two children were studied (44 for each device; 67 boys, 65 girls). Each underwent seven sequential BP measurements on the right arm resting in the sitting position, alternately with the mercury sphygmomanometer read simultaneously by two independent, trained observers and the test device by a third observer.

RESULTS

For the Welch-Allyn monitor, the mean+/-SD of differences (device minus auscultatory BP) were -4.39+/-4.82 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -4.1+/-7.07 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The device failed phase 2.1 for both systolic blood pressure (55, 91 and 98% were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, respectively) and diastolic blood pressure measurements (46, 82 and 95% were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, respectively). For the Dinamap device, the mean+/-SD of differences were -3.08+/-5.21 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -4.61+/-9.35 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The device passed phase 2.1 for systolic blood pressure (71, 96 and 98% were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, respectively) but failed for diastolic blood pressure (51, 72 and 91% were within 5, 10, and 15 mmHg, respectively). For the Datascope device, mean+/-SD of differences were -0.9+/-4.33 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -1.20+/-6.48 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The device passed phase 2.1 in that 84, 97 and 99% of systolic blood pressure, and 61, 89 and 97% of diastolic blood pressure readings were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, respectively. It also passed phase 2.2 for both systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

We performed an independent validation of three oscillometric BP devices in children. Overall Datascope Accutorr Plus passed, whereas Welch-Allyn Vital Sign Monitor and Dinamap Procare-120 failed an adapted IP-ESH.

摘要

目的

根据欧洲高血压学会国际协议(该协议适用于儿童验证),针对5至15岁儿童,将伟伦动态生命体征监测仪、Dinamap Procare - 120和Datascope Accutorr Plus与听诊式汞柱血压计进行对比验证。

方法

对132名儿童进行研究(每种设备44名;67名男孩,65名女孩)。每位儿童右臂处于坐姿时依次进行七次血压测量,由两名经过独立培训的观察者同时读取汞柱血压计测量值,由第三名观察者读取测试设备测量值。

结果

对于伟伦监测仪,收缩压差值(设备测量值减去听诊血压值)的均值±标准差为 -4.39±4.82 mmHg,舒张压差值为 -4.1±7.07 mmHg。该设备在收缩压(分别有55%、91%和98%在5、10和15 mmHg范围内)和舒张压测量(分别有46%、82%和95%在5、10和15 mmHg范围内)方面均未通过第2.1阶段。对于Dinamap设备,收缩压差值的均值±标准差为 -3.08±5.21 mmHg,舒张压差值为 -4.61±9.35 mmHg。该设备收缩压测量通过了第2.1阶段(分别有71%、96%和98%在5、10和15 mmHg范围内),但舒张压测量未通过(分别有51%、72%和91%在5、10和15 mmHg范围内)。对于Datascope设备,收缩压差值的均值±标准差为 -0.9±4.33 mmHg,舒张压差值为 -1.20±6.48 mmHg。该设备通过了第2.1阶段,即收缩压读数分别有84%、97%和99%,舒张压读数分别有61%、89%和97%在5、10和15 mmHg范围内。其收缩压和舒张压测量也通过了第2.2阶段。

结论

我们对三种示波法血压测量设备在儿童中进行了独立验证。总体而言,Datascope Accutorr Plus通过验证,而伟伦动态生命体征监测仪和Dinamap Procare - 120未通过经改编的IP - ESH验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验