McCall Katie, Meston Cindy
University of Texas at Austin, Department of Psychology, Austin, TX, USA.
University of Texas at Austin, Department of Psychology, Austin, TX, USA.
J Sex Med. 2006 Sep;3(5):838-852. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00301.x.
A number of questionnaires have been created to assess levels of sexual desire in women, but to our knowledge, there are currently no validated measures for assessing cues that result in sexual desire. A questionnaire of this nature could be useful for both clinicians and researchers, because it considers the contextual nature of sexual desire and it draws attention to individual differences in factors that can contribute to sexual desire.
The aim of the present study was to create a multidimensional assessment tool of cues for sexual desire in women that is validated in women with and without hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD).
Factor analyses conducted on both an initial sample (N = 874) and a community sample (N = 138) resulted in the Cues for Sexual Desire Scale (CSDS) which included four factors: (i) Emotional Bonding Cues; (ii) Erotic/Explicit Cues; (iii) Visual/Proximity Cues; and (iv) Implicit/Romantic Cues.
Scale construction of cues associated with sexual desire and differences between women with and without sexual dysfunction.
The CSDS demonstrated good reliability and validity and was able to detect significant differences between women with and without HSDD. Results from regression analyses indicated that both marital status and level of sexual functioning predicted scores on the CSDS. The CSDS provided predictive validity for the Female Sexual Function Index desire and arousal domain scores, and increased cues were related to a higher reported frequency of sexual activity in women.
The findings from the present study provide valuable information regarding both internal and external triggers that can result in sexual desire for women. We believe that the CSDS could be beneficial in therapeutic settings to help identify cues that do and do not facilitate sexual desire in women with clinically diagnosed desire difficulties.
已经创建了许多问卷来评估女性的性欲水平,但据我们所知,目前尚无用于评估导致性欲的线索的有效测量方法。这种性质的问卷对临床医生和研究人员都可能有用,因为它考虑了性欲的情境性质,并提请注意可能导致性欲的因素中的个体差异。
本研究的目的是创建一种多维评估工具,用于评估女性性欲线索,并在患有和未患有性欲减退障碍(HSDD)的女性中进行验证。
对初始样本(N = 874)和社区样本(N = 138)进行因素分析,得出性欲线索量表(CSDS),该量表包括四个因素:(i)情感联结线索;(ii)色情/露骨线索;(iii)视觉/接近线索;(iv)隐含/浪漫线索。
与性欲相关的线索的量表构建以及性功能障碍女性与无性功能障碍女性之间的差异。
CSDS显示出良好的信度和效度,并且能够检测出患有和未患有HSDD的女性之间的显著差异。回归分析结果表明,婚姻状况和性功能水平均能预测CSDS得分。CSDS为女性性功能指数性欲和唤起领域得分提供了预测效度,并且增加的线索与女性报告的较高性活动频率相关。
本研究结果提供了有关可能导致女性性欲的内部和外部触发因素的有价值信息。我们认为,CSDS在治疗环境中可能有益,有助于识别在临床上诊断为性欲困难的女性中促进和不促进性欲的线索。