Cella David, Beaumont Jennifer L, Webster Kimberly A, Lai Jin-Shei, Elting Linda
Center on Outcomes, Research and Education, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 1001 University Place, Suite 100, Evanston, IL 60201, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2006 Dec;14(12):1220-31. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0102-1. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
The specific concerns of people with low platelet counts (thrombocytopenia) have not been characterized well in the literature and as a result proper measurement of patient-reported concerns is lacking. We report on the development and validation of questions specifically targeted to patients with thrombocytopenia that can be added to the more general concerns in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General.
An 18-item FACT-Thrombocytopenia Subscale (ThS) was rated and evaluated by thrombocytopenic patients at baseline during a validation study of 40 thrombocytopenic and 43 nonthrombocytopenic cancer patients. To evaluate responsiveness, patients completed a battery of self-report measures including the FACT-Th and were followed up for change in platelet count over 2 weeks.
All subscales and aggregated scores showed high internal consistency at initial assessment and at retesting. Convergent and divergent validity were demonstrated by predicted relationships between FACT-Th subscales and mood, mental and physical component scores of the SF-36, and social desirability. The ThS differentiated patients with low platelets from those with normal platelet counts and good performance from poor performance status patients.
The FACT-Th is a reliable and valid measure for assessing the impact of thrombocytopenia on patients' lives. It can distinguish cancer patients with and without thrombocytopenia and is responsive to increase in platelet count over time. The FACT-Th may therefore prove useful as a measure of self-reported symptoms and concerns related to thrombocytopenia in clinical trials evaluating new pharmacologic agents and/or platelet transfusion practice.
血小板计数低(血小板减少症)患者的具体担忧在文献中尚未得到很好的描述,因此缺乏对患者报告担忧的恰当衡量方法。我们报告了专门针对血小板减少症患者开发并验证的问题,这些问题可添加到癌症治疗功能评估通用版中更一般的担忧问题里。
在一项针对40名血小板减少症癌症患者和43名非血小板减少症癌症患者的验证研究中,血小板减少症患者在基线时对一个包含18个条目的FACT - 血小板减少症子量表(ThS)进行评分和评估。为评估反应性,患者完成了一系列自我报告测量,包括FACT - Th,并在2周内随访血小板计数的变化。
所有子量表和汇总得分在初始评估和重新测试时均显示出高内部一致性。FACT - Th子量表与SF - 36的情绪、心理和身体成分得分以及社会期望之间的预测关系证明了收敛效度和区分效度。ThS能够区分血小板计数低的患者与血小板计数正常的患者,以及表现良好的患者与表现不佳的患者。
FACT - Th是评估血小板减少症对患者生活影响的可靠且有效的测量工具。它能够区分有无血小板减少症的癌症患者,并且对血小板计数随时间的增加有反应。因此,在评估新药和/或血小板输注实践的临床试验中,FACT - Th可能被证明是一种有用的自我报告症状和与血小板减少症相关担忧的测量工具。