Silberstein Stephen D, Hulihan Joseph, Karim M Rezaul, Wu Shu-Chen, Jordan Donna, Karvois Debra, Kamin Marc
Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Clin Ther. 2006 Jul;28(7):1002-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.07.003.
Several large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have found topiramate (TPM) to be effective and generally well tolerated as a preventive therapy for migraine.
This paper evaluates efficacy and safety data from a pilot study of TPM 200 mg/d as preventive therapy in adult subjects with a history of migraine with or without aura.
The pilot study had a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Subjects were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive TPM 200 mg/d or placebo. The double-blind treatment phase consisted of an 8-week titration period (25 mg/d for the first week, followed by weekly increases of 25 mg) and a 12-week maintenance period. The primary efficacy measure was the change in mean monthly migraine frequency. Additional measures were the median percent reduction in monthly migraine frequency and the proportion of responders (those with > or =50%, > or =75%, or 100% reduction in monthly migraine frequency).
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included 211 subjects (138 TPM, 73 placebo; mean [SD] mean weight, 76.7 [18.7] kg). Of 45 subjects who discontinued the study in the TPM group, 21 discontinued during the titration period, compared with 3 of 13 subjects who discontinued in the placebo group. When the efficacy data were assessed using the per-protocol, analysis-of-covariance model, TPM 200 mg/d was not associated with a significant reduction in mean monthly migraine frequency compared with placebo. A post hoc analysis using a Poisson regression model in the ITT population suggested that TPM significantly reduced mean monthly migraine frequency compared with placebo (P=0.04). A significantly larger proportion of TPM-treated subjects had a > or =75% reduction in monthly migraine frequency compared with placebo (P=0.03). At least 1 adverse event was reported by 90.0% and 69.9% of the TPM and placebo groups, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurring in > or =10% of subjects in the TPM group were paresthesia (45%), dizziness (16%), fatigue (16%), nausea (14%), and weight loss (14%). Most treatment-emergent AEs were rated mild or moderate in severity. Of 3 serious AEs (depression, abdominal pain, leg pain) occurring during the trial, none were considered related to either TPM or placebo.
In this pilot study, mean monthly migraine frequency did not differ significantly between TPM and placebo.
多项大型随机双盲安慰剂对照试验发现,托吡酯(TPM)作为偏头痛预防性治疗有效且耐受性良好。
本文评估了一项关于200mg/d托吡酯作为有或无先兆偏头痛成年患者预防性治疗的初步研究的疗效和安全性数据。
该初步研究采用随机双盲安慰剂对照设计。受试者按2:1比例随机分组,分别接受200mg/d托吡酯或安慰剂治疗。双盲治疗阶段包括8周滴定期(第1周25mg/d,随后每周增加25mg)和12周维持期。主要疗效指标为平均每月偏头痛发作频率的变化。其他指标包括每月偏头痛发作频率降低的中位数百分比以及反应者比例(每月偏头痛发作频率降低≥50%、≥75%或100%者)。
意向性治疗(ITT)人群包括211名受试者(138名接受托吡酯,73名接受安慰剂;平均[标准差]体重,76.7[18.7]kg)。托吡酯组45名受试者中,21名在滴定期退出研究,而安慰剂组13名受试者中有3名退出。当使用符合方案协方差分析模型评估疗效数据时,与安慰剂相比200mg/d托吡酯未使平均每月偏头痛发作频率显著降低。在ITT人群中使用泊松回归模型进行事后分析表明,与安慰剂相比托吡酯显著降低了平均每月偏头痛发作频率(P=0.04)。与安慰剂相比,接受托吡酯治疗的受试者中每月偏头痛发作频率降低≥75%的比例显著更高(P=0.03)。托吡酯组和安慰剂组分别有90.0%和69.9%的受试者报告至少发生1次不良事件。托吡酯组中≥10%受试者发生的治疗中出现不良事件(AE)有感觉异常(45%)、头晕(16%)、疲劳(16%)、恶心(14%)和体重减轻(14%)。大多数治疗中出现的不良事件严重程度为轻度或中度。试验期间发生3例严重不良事件(抑郁、腹痛、腿痛),均认为与托吡酯或安慰剂无关。
在这项初步研究中,托吡酯与安慰剂在平均每月偏头痛发作频率上无显著差异。