Liedtke Christian, Fokkenrood Steven A W, Menger Jasper T, van der Kooij Herman, Veltink Peter H
Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Institute for Biomedical Technology (BMTI), P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.
Gait Posture. 2007 Jun;26(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.017. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
Currently, force plates or pressure sensitive insoles are the standard tools to measure ground reaction forces and centre of pressure data during human gait. Force plates, however, impose constraints on foot placement, and the available pressure sensitive insoles measure only one component of force. In this study, shoes instrumented with two force transducers measuring forces and moments in three dimensions were evaluated. Technical performance was assessed by comparing force measurement and centre of pressure reconstructions of the instrumented shoes against a force plate. The effect of the instrumented shoes on gait was investigated using an optical tracking system and a force plate. Instrumented shoes were compared against normal shoes and weighted shoes. The ground reaction force measured with force plate and instrumented shoes differed by 2.2+/-0.1% in magnitude and by 3.4+/-1.3 degrees in direction. The horizontal components differed by 9.9+/-3.8% in magnitude and 26.9+/-10.0 degrees in direction. Centre of pressure location differed by 13.7+/-2.4mm between measurement systems. A MANOVA repeated measures analysis on data of seven subjects, revealed significant differences in gait pattern between shoe types (p</=0.05). A subsequent univariate analysis showed significant differences only in maximum ground reaction force but these could not be attributed to specific shoe types by pair-wise comparison. This study indicates that shoes instrumented with force transducers can be a valuable alternative to current measurement systems if accurate sensing of position and orientation of the force transducers is improved. They are applicable in ambulatory settings and suitable for inverse dynamics analysis.
目前,测力板或压敏鞋垫是测量人类步态期间地面反作用力和压力中心数据的标准工具。然而,测力板对足部放置有限制,并且现有的压敏鞋垫仅测量力的一个分量。在本研究中,对装有两个三维测力和力矩传感器的鞋子进行了评估。通过将装有传感器的鞋子的力测量和压力中心重建与测力板进行比较,评估其技术性能。使用光学跟踪系统和测力板研究了装有传感器的鞋子对步态的影响。将装有传感器的鞋子与普通鞋子和加重鞋子进行比较。测力板和装有传感器的鞋子测量的地面反作用力在大小上相差2.2±0.1%,在方向上相差3.4±1.3度。水平分量在大小上相差9.9±3.8%,在方向上相差26.9±10.0度。测量系统之间的压力中心位置相差13.7±2.4mm。对七名受试者的数据进行的多变量方差分析重复测量显示,不同鞋型之间的步态模式存在显著差异(p≤0.05)。随后的单变量分析仅显示最大地面反作用力存在显著差异,但通过两两比较无法将这些差异归因于特定的鞋型。本研究表明,如果能提高力传感器位置和方向的精确传感,装有力传感器的鞋子可以成为当前测量系统的一种有价值的替代方案。它们适用于动态环境,适合进行逆动力学分析。