Bogacz Rafal, Brown Eric, Moehlis Jeff, Holmes Philip, Cohen Jonathan D
Center for the Study of Brain, Mind and Behavior, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;113(4):700-65. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.700.
In this article, the authors consider optimal decision making in two-alternative forced-choice (TAFC) tasks. They begin by analyzing 6 models of TAFC decision making and show that all but one can be reduced to the drift diffusion model, implementing the statistically optimal algorithm (most accurate for a given speed or fastest for a given accuracy). They prove further that there is always an optimal trade-off between speed and accuracy that maximizes various reward functions, including reward rate (percentage of correct responses per unit time), as well as several other objective functions, including ones weighted for accuracy. They use these findings to address empirical data and make novel predictions about performance under optimality.
在本文中,作者们考虑了二选一强制选择(TAFC)任务中的最优决策。他们首先分析了6种TAFC决策模型,并表明除一种模型外,其他所有模型都可以简化为漂移扩散模型,该模型实现了统计最优算法(在给定速度下最准确或在给定准确性下最快)。他们进一步证明,在速度和准确性之间总是存在一种最优权衡,这种权衡能使各种奖励函数最大化,包括奖励率(每单位时间的正确反应百分比),以及其他几个目标函数,包括加权准确性的函数。他们利用这些发现来处理实证数据,并对最优性条件下的表现做出新的预测。