Akçay Erol, Roughgarden Joan
Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, 371 Serra Mall Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Jan 7;274(1606):25-32. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3689.
The evolution and persistence of biological cooperation have been an important puzzle in evolutionary theory. Here, we suggest a new approach based on bargaining theory to tackle the question. We present a mechanistic model for negotiation of benefits between a nitrogen-fixing nodule and a legume plant. To that end, we first derive growth rates for the nodule and plant from metabolic models of each as a function of material fluxes between them. We use these growth rates as pay-off functions in the negotiation process, which is analogous to collective bargaining between a firm and a workers' union. Our model predicts that negotiations lead to the Nash bargaining solution, maximizing the product of players' pay-offs. This work introduces elements of cooperative game theory into the field of mutualistic interactions. In the discussion of the paper, we argue for the benefits of such an approach in studying the question of biological cooperation.
生物合作的演变与持续存在一直是进化理论中的一个重要谜题。在此,我们提出一种基于讨价还价理论的新方法来解决这个问题。我们提出了一个固氮根瘤与豆科植物之间利益协商的机制模型。为此,我们首先从各自的代谢模型中推导出根瘤和植物的生长速率,将其作为它们之间物质通量的函数。我们在协商过程中使用这些生长速率作为收益函数,这类似于公司与工会之间的集体谈判。我们的模型预测,协商会导致纳什讨价还价解,使参与者收益的乘积最大化。这项工作将合作博弈论的元素引入了互利共生相互作用领域。在论文的讨论部分,我们论证了这种方法在研究生物合作问题中的益处。