Suppr超能文献

What do practitioners think? A qualitative study of a shared care mental health and nutrition primary care program.

作者信息

Paquette-Warren Jann, Vingilis Evelyn, Greenslade Jaimi, Newnam Sharon

机构信息

Population and Community Health Unit, Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, 2nd Floor-Dr. Don Rix Clinical Skills Facility, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C1.

出版信息

Int J Integr Care. 2006 Oct 9;6:e18. doi: 10.5334/ijic.164.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop an in-depth understanding of a shared care model from primary mental health and nutrition care practitioners with a focus on program goals, strengths, challenges and target population benefits.

DESIGN

Qualitative method of focus groups.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The study involved fifty-three practitioners from the Hamilton Health Service Organization Mental Health and Nutrition Program located in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

METHOD

Six focus groups were conducted to obtain the perspective of practitioners belonging to various disciplines or health care teams. A qualitative approach using both an editing and template organization styles was taken followed by a basic content analysis.

MAIN FINDINGS

Themes revealed accessibility, interdisciplinary care, and complex care as the main goals of the program. Major program strengths included flexibility, communication/collaboration, educational opportunities, access to patient information, continuity of care, and maintenance of practitioner and patient satisfaction. Shared care was described as highly dependent on communication style, skill and expertise, availability, and attitudes toward shared care. Time constraint with respect to collaboration was noted as the main challenge.

CONCLUSION

Despite some challenges and variability among practices, the program was perceived as providing better patient care by the most appropriate practitioner in an accessible and comfortable setting.

摘要

相似文献

2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
Does shared care help in the treatment of depression?
Psychiatr Danub. 2010 Nov;22 Suppl 1:S18-22.

引用本文的文献

1
Transformation of primary care settings implementing a co-located team-based care model: a scoping review.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):890. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11291-7.
4
5
Collaborating in the context of co-location: a grounded theory study.
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 10;17:30. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0427-x.
6
A collaborative chain out of phase.
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Mar 14;13:e008. doi: 10.5334/ijic.858. Print 2013 Jan-Mar.
7
[Coordination with mental health services. A pending subject, manifestly improvable].
Aten Primaria. 2009 Mar;41(3):157-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2008.10.011. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
8
Bridging the gap: a virtual health record for integrated home care.
Int J Integr Care. 2007 Jun 27;7:e26. doi: 10.5334/ijic.191.

本文引用的文献

4
Focus groups as a tool for critical social research in nurse education.
Nurse Educ Today. 2001 May;21(4):323-33. doi: 10.1054/nedt.2001.0563.
5
Shared borders: achieving the goals of interdisciplinary patient care.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1998 Jul 1;55(13):1369-74. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/55.13.1369.
6
Approaches for coordinating primary and specialty care for persons with mental illness.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1997 Nov;19(6):395-402. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(97)00046-7.
7
Shared mental health care in Canada.
Can J Psychiatry. 1997 Oct;42(8):suppl 12 pp. doi: 10.1177/070674379704200819.
10
Focus groups.
Int J Qual Health Care. 1996 Oct;8(5):499-504. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验