Ondategui-Parra Silvia, Erturk Sukru M, Ros Pablo R
Hospital Administration, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Nov;187(5):W451-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.1064.
Our purpose was to determine whether quality in academic radiology departments in the United States is systematically measured through indicators and evaluated by preset standards.
We performed a cross-sectional study using a validated survey sent to Society of Chairmen of Academic Radiology Departments (SCARD) members and studied type, frequency of monitoring, and use of preset standards for evaluation of quality indicators. Statistical methods were descriptive summary statistics, chi-square test, analysis of variance, and Spearman's rank correlation test.
The response rate was 42% (55/132). Most responding hospitals were from the Northeast (20/55, 36.4%) and Midwest (18/55, 32.7%). About 58% (32/55) of the responding hospitals had more than 500 beds in operation; 50.9% (28/55) of the radiology departments performed 200,000-400,000 examinations per year. Among the 80% of departments (44/55) that monitored patient satisfaction, only 49.1% and 45.5% assessed referring physician and employee satisfaction, respectively. The most frequently monitored customer satisfaction indicator, patient satisfaction, was monitored quarterly or less frequently by 70.5% (31/44) of departments; about 45.5% (20/44) had preset standards for this indicator. MRI and CT were monitored for patient appointment access by 80% (44/55) and 72.7% (40/55) of departments, respectively; 59.1% (26/44) and 62.5% (25/40) of departments applied preset standards to these indicators, respectively. The reporting-time indicator monitored most frequently was report turnaround time (45/55, 81.8%). None of the differences in mean numbers and monitoring frequencies of the indicators and the use of preset standards to evaluate them by region and size of departments were significant (p >0.05).
Use of quality management indicators, particularly customer satisfaction indicators, is not a fully standardized and established process for academic radiology departments in the United States.
我们的目的是确定美国学术放射科的质量是否通过指标进行系统衡量,并根据预设标准进行评估。
我们进行了一项横断面研究,向学术放射科主任协会(SCARD)成员发送了一份经过验证的调查问卷,研究质量指标评估的类型、监测频率以及预设标准的使用情况。统计方法包括描述性汇总统计、卡方检验、方差分析和Spearman等级相关检验。
回复率为42%(55/132)。大多数回复医院来自东北部(20/55,36.4%)和中西部(18/55,32.7%)。约58%(32/55)的回复医院运营床位超过500张;50.9%(28/55)的放射科每年进行200,000 - 400,000次检查。在监测患者满意度的80%(44/55)的科室中,分别只有49.1%和45.5%评估了转诊医生满意度和员工满意度。最常监测的客户满意度指标——患者满意度,70.5%(31/44)的科室每季度或更低频率进行监测;约45.5%(20/44)的科室对此指标有预设标准。分别有80%(44/55)和72.7%(40/55)的科室监测MRI和CT的患者预约情况;分别有59.1%(26/44)和62.5%(25/40)的科室对这些指标应用了预设标准。最常监测的报告时间指标是报告周转时间(45/55, 81.8%)。各指标的平均数、监测频率以及使用预设标准进行评估在地区和科室规模方面的差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。
质量管理指标的使用,尤其是客户满意度指标,对于美国学术放射科而言并非一个完全标准化且成熟的过程。