Chrzanowski Wlodzimierz K, Marcus Ronald N, Torbeyns Anne, Nyilas Margaretta, McQuade Robert D
Department of Psychiatry, Medical Academy in Bialystok, Plac Brodowicza 1, 16-070, Choroszcz, Poland.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Dec;189(2):259-66. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0564-3. Epub 2006 Oct 21.
To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of aripiprazole with olanzapine in patients with either acute relapsing or chronic, stable schizophrenia.
A 52-week, open-label extension to a 26-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Patients who completed the initial treatment or who met the protocol definition of relapse after > or =2 weeks of double-blind treatment were randomized to aripiprazole (15-30 mg/day, n = 104) or olanzapine (10-20 mg/day, n = 110) for 52 weeks.
Sixty-nine percent of patients completed the study. Efficacy improvements were similar between groups at endpoint, mean reductions in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total scores from baseline for patients completing the study (observed cases) were similar in chronic stable patients (aripiprazole, -7.94; olanzapine, -7.36) and in patients with acute relapse (aripiprazole, -31.19; olanzapine, -29.55). Olanzapine-treated patients reported more extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS)-related adverse events (18%) than aripiprazole-treated patients (10%). No significant differences in EPS were seen between treatments at endpoint. Olanzapine was associated with significantly greater weight gain than aripiprazole at all time points (week 52 [LOCF]: +2.54 vs +0.04 kg; p < 0.001). Changes in fasting glucose and lipid levels at endpoint favored aripiprazole over olanzapine, with significant differences observed for total cholesterol, low- and high-density lipoprotein. While differences observed for changes in fasting glucose and triglycerides favored aripiprazole, they were not statistically significant.
Aripiprazole showed similar efficacy to olanzapine for long-term treatment of acutely psychotic and chronic, stable schizophrenia patients, with a lower liability for weight gain or increased lipid levels.
比较阿立哌唑与奥氮平对急性复发或慢性稳定型精神分裂症患者的长期疗效及安全性。
一项针对慢性精神分裂症患者的为期26周的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的52周开放标签扩展研究。完成初始治疗或在双盲治疗≥2周后符合复发方案定义的患者被随机分为阿立哌唑组(15 - 30毫克/天,n = 104)或奥氮平组(10 - 20毫克/天,n = 110),治疗52周。
69%的患者完成了研究。两组在终点时的疗效改善相似,完成研究的患者(观察病例)的阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)总分从基线的平均降低值在慢性稳定患者中相似(阿立哌唑组为 - 7.94;奥氮平组为 - 7.36),在急性复发患者中也相似(阿立哌唑组为 - 31.19;奥氮平组为 - 29.55)。奥氮平治疗的患者报告的锥体外系症状(EPS)相关不良事件(18%)比阿立哌唑治疗的患者(10%)更多。终点时各治疗组间EPS无显著差异。在所有时间点,奥氮平导致的体重增加均显著高于阿立哌唑(第52周[末次观察结转法]:+2.54千克对 +0.04千克;p < 0.001)。终点时空腹血糖和血脂水平的变化有利于阿立哌唑而非奥氮平,总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白和高密度脂蛋白有显著差异。虽然空腹血糖和甘油三酯变化的差异有利于阿立哌唑,但无统计学意义。
阿立哌唑对急性精神病性和慢性稳定型精神分裂症患者的长期治疗显示出与奥氮平相似的疗效,且体重增加或血脂升高的风险较低。