Schmidt Burkhard, Kremer Markus, Götze Katharina, John Kristina, Peschel Christian, Höfler Heinz, Fend Falko
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Leuk Lymphoma. 2006 Sep;47(9):1857-62. doi: 10.1080/10428190600709127.
Bone marrow (BM) examination is a routine staging procedure in follicular lymphoma (FL). Commonly, both BM histology as well as flow cytometry (FCM) of BM aspirates are performed. In order to compare the diagnostic value of these two techniques, we retrospectively evaluated trephine BM biopsies and listmode data of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of FL, obtained in parallel during a 5-year period. One hundred and thirty nine specimens from 91 patients with FL were eligible for analysis. After joint review, nine cases (6.5%) were reclassified, either in histology (six cases) or FCM (three cases). Seventy nine specimens (57%) showed no infiltration with both methods. Sixty specimens (43%) were scored positive for BM involvement by any of the two techniques. Concordant positive results were obtained in 41 cases (68% of positive BM). False negative results were obtained by FCM in 14 cases (23% of positive BM) and by histology in five cases (8%). Discrepant results between BM histology and FCM are frequent in patients with FL, most likely due to the predominantly paratrabecular infiltration and fibrosis typical for FL. Due to the lower false negative rate, trephine BM biopsy remains crucial for the detection of BM involvement in FL.
骨髓(BM)检查是滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)的常规分期程序。通常,会同时进行骨髓组织学检查以及骨髓穿刺液的流式细胞术(FCM)检测。为了比较这两种技术的诊断价值,我们回顾性评估了5年间并行获取的确诊为FL患者的骨髓活检组织切片和列表模式数据。来自91例FL患者的139份标本符合分析条件。经过联合评估,9例(6.5%)病例被重新分类,其中组织学分类改变6例,流式细胞术分类改变3例。79份标本(57%)两种方法均显示无浸润。60份标本(43%)两种技术中的任何一种检测均显示骨髓受累为阳性。41例(68%的骨髓阳性病例)获得了一致的阳性结果。流式细胞术检测出14例假阴性结果(占骨髓阳性病例的23%),组织学检测出5例假阴性结果(占8%)。FL患者中骨髓组织学和流式细胞术之间的结果差异很常见,这很可能是由于FL典型的主要小梁旁浸润和纤维化。由于假阴性率较低,骨髓活检组织切片对于检测FL患者的骨髓受累情况仍然至关重要。