Sacchini Virgilio, Pinotti José A, Barros Alfredo C S D, Luini Alberto, Pluchinotta Alfonso, Pinotti Marianne, Boratto Marcelo G, Ricci Marco D, Ruiz Carlos A, Nisida Antonio C, Veronesi Paolo, Petit Jean, Arnone Paolo, Bassi Fabio, Disa Joseph J, Garcia-Etienne Carlos A, Borgen Patrick I
Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):704-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.015. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
We evaluated the risks and benefits of nipple-sparing mastectomy in a multiinstitutional experience in the settings of risk-reducing surgery and breast cancer treatment.
We analyzed data on 123 patients who had undergone nipple-sparing mastectomy with breast reconstruction for prophylaxis (n=55), treatment of breast cancer (n=41), or both (n=27) at four large centers.
Median patient age was 45 years (range 22 to 70 years). There were 192 procedures (69 bilateral, 54 unilateral). Forty-four patients had invasive cancer; 20 had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); 4 had phyllodes tumor. In all of these patients, the nipple tissue was cancer free on pathologic review. Median followup was 24.6 months (range 2.0 to 570.4 months). Local recurrence developed in two patients: one had DCIS in the upper-outer quadrant, with 71.8 months of followup; the other's cancer was invasive, in the upper-outer quadrant, with 6 months of followup. Distant metastasis developed in a third patient, who died 50 months after the procedure. Breast cancer developed in two patients after prophylactic mastectomy: one in the upper-outer quadrant at 61.8 months; one in the axillary tail at 24.4 months. No patients had recurrences in the nipple-areolar complex. Necrosis of the nipple was reported in 22 of 192 patients (11%) and it was judged minimal (less than one-third total skin of nipple) in 13 of 22 patients (59%). Overall cosmesis was judged by the patient and surgeon as good to excellent in the majority of patients. Level of satisfaction with cosmetic results was similar between prophylactic and treatment patients.
The risk of local relapse was very low in our series of nipple-sparing mastectomies performed for DCIS or invasive cancer. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in the risk-reducing and breast cancer-treatment settings may be feasible in selected patients and should be the subject of additional prospective clinical trials.
我们在一项多机构研究中评估了保留乳头的乳房切除术在降低风险手术及乳腺癌治疗中的风险与益处。
我们分析了在四个大型中心接受保留乳头乳房切除术并进行乳房重建的123例患者的数据,其中用于预防(n = 55)、治疗乳腺癌(n = 41)或两者皆有(n = 27)。
患者年龄中位数为45岁(范围22至70岁)。共进行了192例手术(69例双侧,54例单侧)。44例患者患有浸润性癌;20例患有导管原位癌(DCIS);4例患有叶状肿瘤。所有这些患者的乳头组织经病理检查均无癌。中位随访时间为24.6个月(范围2.0至570.4个月)。两名患者出现局部复发:一名患者上外象限患有DCIS,随访71.8个月;另一名患者的癌为浸润性,位于上外象限,随访6个月。第三名患者发生远处转移,术后50个月死亡。两名患者在预防性乳房切除术后发生乳腺癌:一名在61.8个月时出现在上外象限;一名在24.4个月时出现在腋窝尾部。乳头乳晕复合体无患者复发。192例患者中有22例(11%)报告乳头坏死,其中22例中的13例(59%)被判定为轻微坏死(乳头总皮肤面积不到三分之一)。大多数患者的整体美容效果经患者和外科医生评估为良好至优秀。预防性和治疗性患者对美容效果的满意度水平相似。
在我们为DCIS或浸润性癌进行的保留乳头乳房切除术系列中,局部复发风险非常低。在降低风险及乳腺癌治疗背景下,保留乳头乳房切除术在部分患者中可能可行,应成为更多前瞻性临床试验的主题。