Aslan Ahmet R, Yücebaş Ergin, Tekin Ali, Sengör Feridun, Kogan Barry A
Division of Urology, Haydarpaşa Numune Research & Education Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2007 Mar;23(3):265-9. doi: 10.1007/s00383-006-1830-5. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
Over the last decade, tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty has become the first choice of surgical technique in patients with distal hypospadias. Despite the excellent cosmetic and functional results, prolonged catheterization (7-14 days) remains the main disadvantage of the TIP repair. In this study, we investigated the outcomes of the short-term catheterization in children with distal hypospadias in order to elucidate any relationship between the length of catheterization and the patients' age, meatal localization and postoperative complication rates. The charts of 183 patients who underwent TIP repair for distal hypospadias in two different centers were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were grouped based on their catheter removal time (before 24 h vs. after 24 h) and the toilet status of children (toilet-trained vs. in-diaper). Children who had at least 6 months of follow-up and regular office visits were included in the study group, and the results were compared to the literature as well as the subgroups were also evaluated in terms of complications and catheterization period. A total of 128 patients with 40.4 months of the mean age (6-180 months) and 22.7 months of the follow-up (6-49 months) were included in the study. For the group 1 patients (n = 99) in whom the urethral catheter was removed before 24 h, the mean age and follow-up were 33.4 months (6-150 months) and 22.3 months (6-48 months), respectively. The catheters of group 2 patients (n = 29) were removed after 24 h, and their mean age and follow-up were 64.4 months (6-180 months) and 24.2 months (6-49 months), respectively. The group 2 patients were significantly older than those of group 1 (P < 0.05). The complications, such as fistula, meatal stenosis, tube dehiscence and buried penis, were seen in 11.1% of the group 1 and 13.8% of the group 2 (11.7% in overall), showing no statistically significant difference. On the other hand, 44% of the patients (n = 56) were toilet-trained at time of surgery. Although the mean age (79 months vs. 10.4 months) and the catheter removal time (64.3% vs. 87.5% before 24 h) of this group were significantly longer than the patients in diaper (P < 0.05), no significant difference was determined in terms of complication (14.2% vs. 9.7%). TIP repair with short-term catheterization has similar outcomes to the patients who conventionally carry their stent 7-14 days. The meatal position and the toileting status of the patients are not important in the use and length of catheterization.
在过去十年中,管状切开板(TIP)尿道成形术已成为远端尿道下裂患者手术技术的首选。尽管在外观和功能方面取得了出色的效果,但长时间留置导尿管(7 - 14天)仍是TIP修复术的主要缺点。在本研究中,我们调查了远端尿道下裂患儿短期留置导尿管的结果,以阐明导尿管留置时间与患者年龄、尿道口位置及术后并发症发生率之间的关系。我们回顾性分析了在两个不同中心接受TIP修复术治疗远端尿道下裂的183例患者的病历。根据导尿管拔除时间(24小时之前与24小时之后)以及患儿的如厕状态(已训练如厕与仍使用尿布)对患者进行分组。研究组纳入了至少随访6个月且定期门诊复诊的患儿,并将结果与文献进行比较,同时也对各亚组的并发症和导尿管留置时间进行了评估。共有128例患者纳入研究,平均年龄为40.4个月(6 - 180个月),随访时间为22.7个月(6 - 49个月)。对于第1组患者(n = 99),其尿道导尿管在24小时之前拔除,则平均年龄和随访时间分别为33.4个月(6 - 150个月)和22.3个月(6 - 48个月)。第2组患者(n = 29)的导尿管在24小时之后拔除,其平均年龄和随访时间分别为64.4个月(6 - 180个月)和24.2个月(6 - 49个月)。第2组患者明显比第1组患者年龄大(P < 0.05)。第1组患者中11.1%出现了瘘管、尿道口狭窄、吻合口裂开和埋藏阴茎等并发症,第2组患者中出现这些并发症的比例为13.8%(总体为11.7%)(无统计学差异)。另一方面,44%的患者(n = 56)在手术时已训练如厕。尽管该组患者的平均年龄(79个月对10.4个月)和导尿管拔除时间(24小时之前拔除的比例为64.3%对87.5%)明显长于仍使用尿布的患者(P < 0.05),但在并发症方面未发现显著差异(14.2%对9.7%)。短期留置导尿管的TIP修复术与传统留置支架7 - 14天的患者具有相似的结果。患者的尿道口位置和如厕状态在导尿管的使用和留置时间方面并不重要。