Suppr超能文献

辅助肌肉活动导致不同手臂姿势和负荷下任务失败时间的变化。

Accessory muscle activity contributes to the variation in time to task failure for different arm postures and loads.

作者信息

Rudroff Thorsten, Barry Benjamin K, Stone Amy L, Barry Carolyn J, Enoka Roger M

机构信息

Dept. of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0354, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Mar;102(3):1000-6. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00564.2006. Epub 2006 Nov 9.

Abstract

Time to failure and electromyogram activity were measured during two types of sustained submaximal contractions with the elbow flexors that required each subject to exert the same net muscle torque with the forearm in two different postures. Twenty men performed the tasks, either by maintaining a constant force while pushing against a force transducer (force task), or by supporting an equivalent load while maintaining a constant elbow angle (position task). The time to failure for the position task with the elbow flexed at 1.57 rad and the forearm horizontal was less than that for the force task (5.2 +/- 2.6 and 8.8 +/- 3.6 min, P = 0.003), whereas it was similar when the forearm was vertical (7.9 +/- 4.1 and 7.8 +/- 4.5 min, P = 0.995). The activity of the rotator cuff muscles was greater during the position tasks (25.1 +/- 10.1% maximal voluntary contraction) compared with the force tasks (15.2 +/- 5.4% maximal voluntary contraction, P < 0.001) in both forearm postures. However, the rates of increase in electromyogram of the accessory muscles and mean arterial pressure were greater for the position task only when the forearm was horizontal (P < 0.05), whereas it was similar for the elbow flexors. These findings indicate that forearm posture influences the difference in the time to failure for the two fatiguing contractions. When there was a difference between the two tasks, the task with the briefer time to failure involved greater rates of increase in accessory muscle activity and mean arterial pressure.

摘要

在两种类型的持续次最大收缩过程中,测量了肱二头肌的疲劳时间和肌电图活动,这两种收缩要求每个受试者在前臂处于两种不同姿势时施加相同的净肌肉扭矩。20名男性完成了这些任务,要么在推压力传感器时保持恒定的力(力任务),要么在保持恒定肘角时支撑等效负荷(位置任务)。当肘关节屈曲1.57弧度且前臂水平时,位置任务的疲劳时间短于力任务(分别为5.2±2.6分钟和8.8±3.6分钟,P = 0.003),而当前臂垂直时两者相似(分别为7.9±4.1分钟和7.8±4.5分钟,P = 0.995)。在两种前臂姿势下,与力任务(最大自主收缩的15.2±5.4%)相比,位置任务期间肩袖肌的活动更大(最大自主收缩的25.1±10.1%,P < 0.001)。然而,仅当前臂水平时,位置任务中辅助肌肌电图和平均动脉压的增加速率才更大(P < 0.05),而肱二头肌的情况相似。这些发现表明,前臂姿势会影响两种疲劳收缩的疲劳时间差异。当两项任务存在差异时,疲劳时间较短的任务涉及辅助肌活动和平均动脉压的更大增加速率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验