Keshavarz Reza, Patel Romil, Bachar Roy, Laddis Dimitri
North General Hospital, New York, NY 10035, USA.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Nov;22(11):704-9. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000238742.96606.20.
Child safety devices (infant seats, booster seats, and seat belts) are effective in curbing the risk of injury; however, there remains a pattern of parental nonuse or misuse of safety seats. The aim of this study was to assess the level of knowledge and compliance of parents with children presenting for emergency care of the National Highway and Traffic Association safety seat guidelines in private cars and taxicabs.
Two hundred forty-two caregivers of children (ages range, 2 weeks to 19 years) presenting for care in the pediatric emergency department of an urban university hospital were approached to complete an interviewer-administered questionnaire, and 225 participated. The questionnaire included knowledge, attitude, and behavior questions on protective equipment for various aged children.
Eleven (47.8%) of 23 children 1 year or younger were reported to use infant seats often or always while riding in private cars, compared with 8 (22.2%) of 36 children 1 year or younger were reported to their use while in taxis (P < 0.05). Seventeen (85%) of 20 children older than 8 years were reported to have used seat belts often or always in private cars versus 10 (41.7%) of 24 in taxis (P < 0.01). One hundred fifty-four (99.3%) of 155 subjects knew the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration recommended position for the safety seat for their child. Most parents believed in the efficacy of child safety seats in preventing vehicle injuries and reported they would be more likely to use safety devices if they received information on their use in the emergency department.
Data from this survey show that use of safety seats is lower in taxis than in private automobiles and that this is attributable to the inconvenience of carrying these seats to and from the taxi rather than financial considerations or lack of knowledge about their effectiveness. Strategies should be sought to increase availability of child safety devices in taxicabs. The emergency department, as well as the pediatrician's office or clinic, can be a locus for an educational intervention to parents and caregivers on child passenger safety.
儿童安全装置(婴儿座椅、增高座椅和安全带)在降低受伤风险方面很有效;然而,父母不使用或误用安全座椅的情况仍然存在。本研究的目的是评估私家车和出租车中带孩子前来接受急诊治疗的父母对美国国家公路交通安全协会安全座椅指南的知晓程度和遵守情况。
在一家城市大学医院的儿科急诊科,研究人员邀请了242名儿童(年龄范围为2周至19岁)的照顾者填写一份由访谈者管理的问卷,225人参与。问卷包括关于不同年龄段儿童防护设备的知识、态度和行为问题。
据报告,23名1岁及以下儿童中有11名(47.8%)在乘坐私家车时经常或总是使用婴儿座椅,而36名1岁及以下儿童中只有8名(22.2%)在乘坐出租车时使用(P<0.05)。据报告,20名8岁以上儿童中有17名(85%)在私家车中经常或总是使用安全带,而24名中只有10名(41.7%)在出租车中使用(P<0.01)。155名受试者中有154名(99.3%)知道美国国家公路交通安全管理局推荐的适合其孩子的安全座椅位置。大多数父母相信儿童安全座椅在预防车辆伤害方面的功效,并表示如果在急诊科获得关于安全座椅使用的信息,他们更有可能使用安全装置。
本次调查数据显示,出租车中安全座椅的使用率低于私家车,这是由于携带安全座椅上下出租车不方便,而非经济因素或对其有效性缺乏了解。应寻求策略以增加出租车中儿童安全装置的可用性。急诊科以及儿科医生办公室或诊所可以成为对父母和照顾者进行儿童乘客安全方面教育干预的场所。