Hull Mindy J, Nazarian Rosalynn M, Wheeler Amy E, Black-Schaffer W Stephen, Mark Eugene J
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Hum Pathol. 2007 Feb;38(2):342-50. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.08.011. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
The national decline in hospital autopsy cases negatively impacts physician education and medical quality control to an unknown degree. The current non-medicolegal autopsy rate is less than 5% of hospital deaths. This study compares internal medicine and pathology resident physician perceptions of the autopsy, including the importance, procurement, technique, and the pathologist-internist interaction. An 84-item survey based on autopsy literature was designed, piloted, and distributed to 214 residents at a single 800+ bed tertiary care academic teaching hospital (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston) to accomplish this goal. Completed surveys were obtained from 72% of medicine (n = 118) and 84% of pathology (n = 42) residents. Residents strongly agree on the importance of autopsies for education, answering clinical questions, public health, and research. Autopsy rates are deemed inadequate. Internists are comfortable requesting autopsies, but report insufficient guidance and difficulty with answering technical questions. Although not requested on all hospital deaths, internists are more likely to initiate an autopsy request than a decedent's family, and worry significantly less about institutional costs and malpractice litigation than pathologists believe. Internists expressed interest in having an instructional brochure to give families, observing an autopsy, and having increased communication and support with autopsies from pathology residents. The main reasons why autopsy consent is not requested (it is unpleasant, cause of death is known, family is upset or seems unwilling) and why families refuse (patient has suffered enough, body may be handled disrespectfully, religious/moral objections, lack information) were similar for both resident groups. Despite their decline, autopsies still remain important to medicine as indicated by internal medicine and pathology residents at a large academic center. Improving autopsy education, enhancing availability of resources, and strengthening the pathologist-internist collaboration may serve to heighten awareness and ultimately procurement.
全国医院尸检病例数量的下降对医师教育和医疗质量控制产生了程度未知的负面影响。当前非法医尸检率低于医院死亡病例的5%。本研究比较了内科和病理科住院医师对尸检的看法,包括其重要性、获取方式、技术以及病理科医师与内科医师之间的互动。为实现这一目标,基于尸检文献设计了一份包含84个条目的调查问卷,进行了预试验,并分发给一家拥有800多张床位的三级医疗学术教学医院(波士顿的麻省总医院)的214名住院医师。内科住院医师(n = 118)和病理科住院医师(n = 42)中分别有72%和84%完成了调查问卷。住院医师强烈认同尸检对于教育、解答临床问题、公共卫生和研究的重要性。他们认为尸检率不足。内科医师在提出尸检要求时感到自在,但表示缺乏足够的指导,且在回答技术问题方面存在困难。尽管并非对所有医院死亡病例都进行尸检,但内科医师比死者家属更有可能提出尸检要求,并且与病理科医师的看法相比,他们对机构成本和医疗事故诉讼的担忧要少得多。内科医师表示有兴趣获得一份给家属的指导性手册、观摩尸检,以及与病理科住院医师就尸检事宜加强沟通和获得支持。两个住院医师群体对于不提出尸检同意请求的主要原因(尸检令人不适、已知死亡原因、家属心烦意乱或似乎不愿意)以及家属拒绝的主要原因(患者已经受够了、尸体可能得不到妥善处理、宗教/道德方面的反对、缺乏信息)看法相似。一家大型学术中心的内科和病理科住院医师表明,尽管尸检数量有所下降,但尸检对医学仍然很重要。改善尸检教育、增加资源可用性以及加强病理科医师与内科医师之间的合作可能有助于提高认识并最终增加尸检数量。