Narváez Julio, Zimmerman Grenith, Stulting R Doyle, Chang Daniel H
Department of Ophthalmology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Dec;32(12):2050-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.09.009.
To compare the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations using 4 formulas: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T.
Tertiary care center.
This study was a retrospective comparative analysis. Immersion ultrasound biometry (axial length, anterior chamber depth, and lens thickness), manual keratometry, and postoperative manifest refraction were obtained in 643 eyes of consecutive patients who had routine uneventful cataract surgery with implantation of 1 of 2 IOLs using the same operative technique by the same surgeon. Biometric data were entered into each of the 4 IOL power calculation formulas, and the results were compared to the final manifest refraction. An optimized lens constant was used for each formula. Results were also stratified into groups of short, average, medium long, and very long axial length <22.0 mm, 22.0 to <24.5 mm, 24.5 to 26.0 mm, and >26.0 mm, respectively).
No formula was more accurate than the others as measured by mean absolute error. The formulas were also equally accurate when eyes were stratified by axial length.
The 4 IOL power formulas provided equivalent refractive results in the entire group of eyes and in the subsets of axial lengths tested.
比较使用4种公式(霍弗Q公式、霍拉迪1公式、霍拉迪2公式和SRK/T公式)计算人工晶状体(IOL)屈光度的准确性。
三级医疗中心。
本研究为回顾性对比分析。对连续接受常规白内障手术且手术顺利的患者的643只眼进行测量,这些患者由同一位外科医生采用相同手术技术植入两种IOL中的一种,测量项目包括浸没式超声生物测量法(眼轴长度、前房深度和晶状体厚度)、手动角膜曲率测量以及术后显验光。将生物测量数据输入4种IOL屈光度计算公式中,并将结果与最终显验光进行比较。每个公式均使用优化后的晶状体常数。结果还按照眼轴长度分为短、平均、中长和非常长四组(分别为<22.0 mm、22.0至<24.5 mm、24.5至26.0 mm和>26.0 mm)。
通过平均绝对误差衡量,没有一种公式比其他公式更准确。当按眼轴长度对眼睛进行分层时,这些公式的准确性也相同。
在整个眼睛组以及所测试的眼轴长度子集中,这4种IOL屈光度公式得出的屈光结果相当。