Inventing the randomized double-blind trial: the Nuremberg salt test of 1835.
作者信息
Stolberg M
机构信息
Institut für Geschichte der Medizin, Oberer Neubergweg 10a, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.
出版信息
J R Soc Med. 2006 Dec;99(12):642-3. doi: 10.1177/014107680609901216.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Inventing the randomized double-blind trial: the Nuremberg salt test of 1835.
J R Soc Med. 2006 Dec;99(12):642-3. doi: 10.1177/014107680609901216.
2
Adjunctive homeopathic treatment in patients with severe sepsis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in an intensive care unit. 2005.
Homeopathy. 2011 Jan-Apr;100(1-2):95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2011.02.013.
3
["I bet 10 to 1 that you will feel something unusual even without faith". The table salt trials of Nürnberg - a ground breaking experiment as a result of public dispute].
Neuere Med Wiss Quellen Stud. 2012;22:19-31.
4
Knowing what we are talking about: the CORE-Hom database on clinical research in homeopathy is an important advance.
Homeopathy. 2014 Oct;103(4):217-8. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
5
[Homeopathy--a 200-year old controversy].
Versicherungsmedizin. 2005 Sep 1;57(3):146-7.
6
Evaluating clinical research and bloodletting. (Seriously).
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;35(6):488-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181f2c474.
7
The landscape and lexicon of blinding in randomized trials.
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Feb 5;136(3):254-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-3-200202050-00022.
8
[200 years of homeopathy].
Kinderkrankenschwester. 1996 Dec;15(12):469-70.
9
[Rationalist, magician, scharlatan? Samuel Hahnemann and homeopathy from the viewpoint of homeopathy].
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2005 Mar 16;94(11):443-6.
10
The end of veterinary homeopathy.
Aust Vet J. 2007 Dec;85(12):513-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2007.00174.x.
引用本文的文献
1
Yes to pluralistic health system, but no to homeopathy.
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023 Feb 20;10:100172. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100172. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Against all odds-the persistent popularity of homeopathy.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2020 May;132(9-10):232-242. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01624-x. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
3
Objecting to experiments that compare two unobjectionable policies or treatments.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 28;116(22):10723-10728. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820701116. Epub 2019 May 9.
4
The Bell Tolls for Homeopathy: Time for Change in the Training and Practice of North American Naturopathic Physicians.
J Evid Based Integr Med. 2019 Jan-Dec;24:2515690X18823696. doi: 10.1177/2515690X18823696.
5
Placebo eff ects in psychiatry: mediators and moderators.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;2(3):246-57. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00092-3.
6
Experiments: Why and How?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):613-32. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9635-3. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
7
[Clinical significance of the placebo effect].
Anaesthesist. 2008 May;57(5):447-63. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1370-6.
8
A brief history of homeopathy.
J R Soc Med. 2006 Dec;99(12):607-10. doi: 10.1177/014107680609901206.
本文引用的文献
1
Intentional ignorance: a history of blind assessment and placebo controls in medicine.
Bull Hist Med. 1998 Fall;72(3):389-433. doi: 10.1353/bhm.1998.0159.
Zotero 插件