Suppr超能文献

急性等容血液稀释时,羟乙基淀粉200和240对主动脉可扩张性的影响不同,但对粘度和血压无影响。

Hydroxyethylstarch 200 and 240 differently affect aortic distensibility but not viscosity and blood pressure upon acute isovolumic hemodilution.

作者信息

Caron Alexis, Hacquard Marie, Audibert Gérard, Cauchois Ghislaine, Vigneron Claude, Stoltz Jean-François, Longrois Dan, Menu Patrick

机构信息

Laboratory of Hematology and Physiology, EA 3452, Faculty of Pharmacy, University Henri Poincaré, Nancy, France.

出版信息

Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2006;35(4):447-58.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

It has been shown that a hydroxyethylstarch solution significantly increases the aortic distensibility coefficient (ADC) as compared to other non-hydroxyethylstarch colloid solutions. In order to investigate whether the effect of hydroxyethylstarch on ADC is class-specific, we investigated the effect of two hydroxyethylstarch solutions (HES 200: Elohes and HES 240: Hesteril) on the ADC and compared them with two other colloid solutions: 5% albumin and fluid gelatin (Gelofusin) in a rabbit model of acute isovolumic hemodilution.

METHODS

Twenty-eight male New Zealand white rabbits were anesthetized and randomly allocated to receive (n=7, each): albumin, hydroxyethylstarch-200, hydroxyethylstarch-240 and gelatin for acute isovolumic hemodilution by exchanging 13 ml.kg(-1) body weight of blood with an identical volume of the test solution. Blood viscosity, mean arterial pressure, aortic blood flow and heart rate were measured and ADC was calculated.

RESULTS

All groups were comparable with respect to arterial pressure, heart rate and aortic blood flow velocity before and after isovolumic hemodilution. After hemodilution, ADC coefficient remained unchanged as compared with pre-hemodilution values with albumin, hydroxyethylstarch-240 and gelatin, whereas a sustained 3 fold increase was observed with hydroxyethylstarch-200.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that minor physicochemical differences between two hydroxyethylstarch solutions result in measurable differences in ADC and suggest that the clinical effects of colloids should probably be analyzed for each type of colloid and not for classes of colloids (e.g. hydroxyethylstarch or fluid gelatins).

摘要

目的

研究表明,与其他非羟乙基淀粉胶体溶液相比,羟乙基淀粉溶液可显著提高主动脉扩张系数(ADC)。为了研究羟乙基淀粉对ADC的影响是否具有类别特异性,我们在急性等容血液稀释的兔模型中,研究了两种羟乙基淀粉溶液(HES 200:Elohes和HES 240:Hesteril)对ADC的影响,并将它们与另外两种胶体溶液:5%白蛋白和明胶溶液(Gelofusin)进行比较。

方法

28只雄性新西兰白兔麻醉后,随机分为四组(每组n = 7),分别接受白蛋白、羟乙基淀粉-200、羟乙基淀粉-240和明胶溶液进行急性等容血液稀释,通过用相同体积的测试溶液置换13 ml·kg⁻¹体重的血液。测量血液粘度、平均动脉压、主动脉血流量和心率,并计算ADC。

结果

等容血液稀释前后,所有组在动脉压、心率和主动脉血流速度方面具有可比性。血液稀释后,白蛋白、羟乙基淀粉-240和明胶组的ADC系数与血液稀释前的值相比保持不变,而羟乙基淀粉-200组观察到持续3倍的增加。

结论

这些结果表明,两种羟乙基淀粉溶液之间微小的物理化学差异导致了ADC的可测量差异,提示胶体的临床效果可能应针对每种胶体类型进行分析,而不是针对胶体类别(如羟乙基淀粉或明胶溶液)进行分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验