Suppr超能文献

[柏林问卷是肺康复中睡眠医学的合适诊断工具吗?]

[Is the Berlin questionnaire an appropriate diagnostic tool for sleep medicine in pneumological rehabilitation?].

作者信息

Weinreich G, Plein K, Teschler T, Resler J, Teschler H

机构信息

Ruhrlandklinik, Abteilung Pneumologie - Universitätsklinik, Essen.

出版信息

Pneumologie. 2006 Dec;60(12):737-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-944270.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Berlin Questionnaire is an explorative tool of 13 questions designed to identify patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The questions are targeted toward key symptoms of snoring, apneas, daytime sleepiness, hypertension and overweight.

METHODS

153 patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation were screened for obstructive sleep apnea via i) ApneaLink (ResMed, Munich) and ii) the Berlin Questionnaire. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) was administered to grade daytime sleepiness. Results of ApneaLink screening and questionnaires were prospectively compared. The Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI) was used to compute predictive performance of the Berlin Questionnaire for obstructive sleep apnea. Results were also compared to previously published data from a primary care patient cohort.

RESULTS

At a cut-off RDI=10/h, the Berlin Questionnaire had a sensitivity of 62.5 %, a specificity of 53.8 %, a positive predictive value of 38.4 %, a negative predictive value of 74.2 %, a positive likelihood ratio of 1.35 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.69. At a cut-off RDI=15/h, the Berlin Questionnaire had a sensitivity of 67.2 %, a specificity of 52.8 %, a positive predictive value of 25.1 %, a negative predictive value of 84.7 %, a positive likelihood ratio of 1.42 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.62. There was evidence that the participants of this study suffered from an increased daytime sleepiness (ESS=8.8 +/- 4.8). The study group was more likely to snore, have apneas (men 6.7 % more often, women 12.6 % more often) and suffer from daytime sleepiness (men 19.0 % more often, women 14.6 % more often) than the control group. Also, hypertension and overweight were more prevalent (men 6.1 % more often, women 11.1 % more often).

CONCLUSIONS

The Berlin Questionnaire is a poor predictor of obstructive sleep apnea in a random group of patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation.

摘要

背景

柏林问卷是一个由13个问题组成的探索性工具,旨在识别阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者。这些问题针对打鼾、呼吸暂停、日间嗜睡、高血压和超重等关键症状。

方法

对153名接受肺康复治疗的患者通过以下方式进行阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停筛查:i)使用ApneaLink(瑞思迈公司,慕尼黑)和ii)使用柏林问卷。采用爱泼华嗜睡量表(ESS)对日间嗜睡程度进行分级。对ApneaLink筛查结果和问卷结果进行前瞻性比较。使用呼吸紊乱指数(RDI)来计算柏林问卷对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的预测性能。结果还与之前发表的来自初级保健患者队列的数据进行了比较。

结果

在RDI = 10/小时的截断值时,柏林问卷的敏感性为62.5%,特异性为53.8%,阳性预测值为38.4%,阴性预测值为74.2%,阳性似然比为1.35,阴性似然比为0.69。在RDI = 15/小时的截断值时,柏林问卷的敏感性为67.2%,特异性为52.8%,阳性预测值为25.1%,阴性预测值为84.7%,阳性似然比为1.42,阴性似然比为0.62。有证据表明本研究的参与者存在日间嗜睡增加的情况(ESS = 8.8 ± 4.8)。与对照组相比,研究组更有可能打鼾、出现呼吸暂停(男性多6.7%,女性多12.6%)以及遭受日间嗜睡(男性多19.0%,女性多14.6%)。此外,高血压和超重也更为普遍(男性多6.1%,女性多11.1%)。

结论

在一组随机的接受肺康复治疗的患者中,柏林问卷对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的预测能力较差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验