Chen Qiaoling, Zhang Yuanzhi, Ekroos Ari
Institute of Law, Helsinki University of Technology, PO Box 1200, FIN-02015 HUT, Espoo, Finland.
Environ Monit Assess. 2007 Sep;132(1-3):53-65. doi: 10.1007/s10661-006-9502-4. Epub 2006 Dec 14.
In this paper, we first review the development of China's Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) system in the past 30 years. Then we compare the framework and operational procedures of China's new EIA law with those of the EU EIA Directive. We also compare public participation, as well as sanctions and control in the two EIA systems. In addition, we identify where the processes in both EIA systems are similar or different from one another. By comparison, we noted that there are at least three obvious weaknesses in China's EIA system: (1) the application of new models for EIA legislation; (2) the improvement of EIA guidance and education; and (3) the enhancement of public participation in EIA process. Our study indicates that these three major shortcomings should be overcome and improved in China's EIA system, when compared with the EU EIA system.
在本文中,我们首先回顾了中国环境影响评价(EIA)系统在过去30年中的发展。然后我们将中国新的环境影响评价法的框架和操作程序与欧盟环境影响评价指令的框架和操作程序进行了比较。我们还比较了两个环境影响评价系统中的公众参与以及制裁和控制措施。此外,我们确定了两个环境影响评价系统中的流程在哪些方面相似或不同。通过比较,我们注意到中国的环境影响评价系统至少存在三个明显的弱点:(1)环境影响评价立法新模型的应用;(2)环境影响评价指导和教育的改进;(3)公众在环境影响评价过程中的参与度提高。我们的研究表明,与欧盟环境影响评价系统相比,中国的环境影响评价系统应克服并改进这三个主要缺点。