LaBresh Kenneth A
MassPro, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Dec;31(6 Suppl 2):S246-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.08.012.
The Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry prototypes baseline data collection demonstrated a significant gap in the use of evidenced-based interventions. Barriers to the use of these interventions can be characterized as relating to lack of knowledge, attitudes, and ineffective behaviors and systems. Quality improvement programs can address these issues by providing didactic presentations to disseminate the science and peer interactions to address the lack of belief in the evidence, guidelines, and likelihood of improved patient outcomes. Even with knowledge and intention to provide evidenced-based care, the absence of effective systems is a significant behavioral barrier. A program for quality improvement that includes multidisciplinary teams of clinical and quality improvement professionals has been successfully used to carry out redesign of stroke care delivery systems. Teams are given a methodology to set goals, test ideas for system redesign, and implement those changes that can be successfully adapted to the hospital's environment. Bringing teams from several hospitals together substantially accelerates the process by sharing examples of successful change and by providing strategies to support the behavior change necessary for the adoption of new systems. The participation of many hospitals also creates momentum for the adoption of change by demonstrating observable and successful improvement. Data collection and feedback are useful to demonstrate the need for change and evaluate the impact of system change, but improvement occurs very slowly without a quality improvement program. This quality improvement framework provides hospitals with the capacity and support to redesign systems, and has been shown to improve stroke care considerably, when coupled with an Internet-based decision support registry, and at a much more rapid pace than when hospitals use only the support registry.
保罗·科弗代尔国家急性卒中登记处的基线数据收集原型显示,在循证干预措施的使用方面存在显著差距。这些干预措施的使用障碍可被描述为与知识缺乏、态度问题以及无效的行为和系统有关。质量改进计划可以通过提供教学讲座来传播科学知识,并通过同行互动来解决对证据、指南以及改善患者预后可能性的信心不足问题,从而解决这些问题。即使有提供循证护理的知识和意愿,缺乏有效的系统仍是一个重大的行为障碍。一个包括临床和质量改进专业人员多学科团队的质量改进计划已成功用于对卒中护理提供系统进行重新设计。团队被赋予一种方法来设定目标、测试系统重新设计的想法,并实施那些能够成功适应医院环境的变革。将几家医院的团队聚集在一起,通过分享成功变革的实例以及提供支持采用新系统所需行为改变的策略,可大幅加速这一进程。许多医院的参与还通过展示可观察到的成功改进,为采用变革创造了动力。数据收集和反馈有助于证明变革的必要性并评估系统变革的影响,但如果没有质量改进计划,改进过程会非常缓慢。这种质量改进框架为医院提供了重新设计系统的能力和支持,并且已证明,与基于互联网的决策支持登记处相结合时,能比医院仅使用支持登记处时更快速地显著改善卒中护理。