Poolman Rudolf W, Sierevelt Inger N, Farrokhyar Forough, Mazel J Adriaan, Blankevoort Leendert, Bhandari Mohit
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital, 7 North, Room 727, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jan;89(1):206-15. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00633.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume (The Journal) recently initiated a section called "Evidence-Based Orthopaedics." Furthermore, a level-of-evidence rating is now used in The Journal to help readers in clinical decision-making. Little is known about whether this recent emphasis has influenced surgeons' perceptions about and competence in evidence-based medicine. Therefore, we examined perceptions and competence in evidence-based medicine among Dutch orthopaedic surgeons.
Members of the Dutch Orthopaedic Association were surveyed to examine their attitudes toward evidence-based medicine and their competence in evidence-based medicine. We evaluated competences using a newly developed instrument tailored to surgical practice.
Of the 611 members, 367 surgeons (60%) responded. Orthopaedic surgeons welcomed evidence-based medicine. Practical evidence-based medicine resources were perceived as the best method to move from opinion-based or experience-based to evidence-based practice. Four variables were significantly and positively associated with the competence instrument: (1) a younger age, particularly between thirty-six and forty-five years (p = 0.007), (2) experience of less than ten years (p = 0.032), (3) having a PhD degree (p < 0.001), and (4) working in an academic or teaching setting (p = 0.004). The majority of the respondents were aware of The Journal's evidence-based medicine section (84%) and level-of-evidence ratings (65%), and 20% used The Journal's evidence-based medicine abstracts in clinical decision-making. This increased awareness of evidence-based medicine was also reflected in the frequent use of Cochrane reviews in clinical decision-making (27% of the respondents). Surgeons who used and those who were aware of but did not use The Journal's evidence-based medicine abstracts or Cochrane reviews in clinical decision-making had significantly higher competence instrument scores than those who were unaware of these resources (p = 0.03 and p < 0.001, respectively).
Evidence-based medicine is welcomed by Dutch orthopaedic surgeons. The recent emphasis on evidence-based medicine is reflected in an increased awareness about The Journal's evidence-based medicine section, levels of evidence, and the largest evidence-based medicine resource: the Cochrane reviews. Younger orthopaedic surgeons had better knowledge about evidence-based medicine. The development and use of evidence-based resources as well as preappraised summaries such as The Journal's evidence-based medicine abstracts and Cochrane reviews were perceived as the best way to move from opinion-based to evidence-based orthopaedic practice.
《骨与关节外科杂志》美国版(以下简称《杂志》)最近开设了一个名为“循证骨科学”的板块。此外,《杂志》现在使用证据等级评定来帮助读者进行临床决策。对于这种近期的重点关注是否影响了外科医生对循证医学的认知和能力,目前知之甚少。因此,我们调查了荷兰骨科医生对循证医学的认知和能力。
对荷兰骨科协会的成员进行调查,以了解他们对循证医学的态度及其循证医学能力。我们使用一种专门为外科实践开发的新工具来评估能力。
611名成员中,367名外科医生(60%)做出了回应。骨科医生欢迎循证医学。实用的循证医学资源被认为是从基于观点或经验的实践转向循证实践的最佳方法。有四个变量与能力评估工具显著正相关:(1)年龄较轻,特别是36至45岁之间(p = 0.007);(2)经验少于10年(p = 0.032);(3)拥有博士学位(p < 0.001);(4)在学术或教学机构工作(p = 0.004)。大多数受访者知道《杂志》的循证医学板块(84%)和证据等级评定(65%),20%在临床决策中使用了《杂志》的循证医学摘要。这种对循证医学认知的提高也反映在临床决策中对Cochrane系统评价的频繁使用上(27%的受访者)。在临床决策中使用以及知道但未使用《杂志》的循证医学摘要或Cochrane系统评价的外科医生,其能力评估工具得分显著高于那些不知道这些资源的外科医生(分别为p = 0.03和p < 0.001)。
循证医学受到荷兰骨科医生的欢迎。近期对循证医学的重点关注体现在对《杂志》循证医学板块、证据等级以及最大的循证医学资源Cochrane系统评价的认知增加上。年轻的骨科医生对循证医学有更好的了解。开发和使用循证资源以及预先评估的总结,如《杂志》的循证医学摘要和Cochrane系统评价,被认为是从基于观点的骨科实践转向循证骨科实践的最佳方式。