Suppr超能文献

为重度残疾的老年痴呆患者提供管饲

Tube feeding in the demented elderly with severe disabilities.

作者信息

Jaul Efraim, Singer Pierre, Calderon-Margalit Ronit

机构信息

Department of Skilled Geriatric Nursing, Herzog Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel, Affiliated to Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Isr Med Assoc J. 2006 Dec;8(12):870-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the ongoing debate on tube feeding of severely demented patients, the current approach in western countries is to avoid feeding by tube.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical course and outcome of demented elderly patients with severe disabilities, by feeding mode.

METHODS

The study was conducted in a skilled nursing department of a major psychogeriatric hospital in Israel. Eighty-eight patients aged 79 +/- 9 years were followed for 17 months: 62 were fed by nasogastric tube and 26 were orally fed. The groups were compared for background characteristics, underlying medical condition, functional impairment, clinical and nutritional outcomes, and survival.

RESULTS

Tube feeding had no beneficial effect on clinical and nutritional outcomes or on healing preexisting pressure ulcers, compared with oral feeding. Very few patients on tube feeding showed signs of discomfort, partly because of low cognitive function. Survival was significantly higher in the tube-fed patients (P < 0.001), which could be partly explain by the different case mix (i.e., the underlying diseases)

CONCLUSIONS

Tube feeding seems to have no nutritional advantage in severely demented elderly patients. Median survival was longer in tube-fed individuals who had no acute co-morbidity. However, since tube feeding does not add to patient pain and discomfort, it should not be contraindicated when it complies with the values and wishes of patients and their families.

摘要

背景

尽管关于为重度痴呆患者进行管饲的争论仍在继续,但西方国家目前的做法是避免管饲。

目的

根据喂养方式评估重度残疾痴呆老年患者的临床病程及结局。

方法

该研究在以色列一家大型老年精神科医院的专业护理部门进行。88名年龄为79±9岁的患者被随访17个月:62名通过鼻胃管喂养,26名经口喂养。比较两组患者的背景特征、基础疾病状况、功能损害、临床和营养结局以及生存率。

结果

与经口喂养相比,管饲对临床和营养结局或对已有的压疮愈合没有有益影响。接受管饲的患者中很少有人表现出不适迹象,部分原因是认知功能低下。管饲患者的生存率显著更高(P<0.001),这部分可以通过不同的病例组合(即基础疾病)来解释。

结论

管饲在重度痴呆老年患者中似乎没有营养优势。无急性合并症的管饲患者中位生存期更长。然而,由于管饲不会增加患者的疼痛和不适,当符合患者及其家属的价值观和意愿时,不应将其视为禁忌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验