Barsky Adam, Kaplan Seth A
Department of Management, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):286-95. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.286.
Whereas research interest in both individual affect/temperament and organizational justice has grown substantially in recent years, affect's role in the perception of organizational justice has received scant attention. Here, the authors integrate these literatures and test bivariate relationships between state affect (e.g., moods), trait affect (e.g., affectivity), and organizational justice variables using meta-analytically aggregated effect sizes. Results indicated that state and trait positive and negative affect exhibit statistically significant relationships with perceptions of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice in the predicted directions, with mean population-level correlations ranging in absolute magnitude from M(rho) = .09 to M(rho) = .43. Correlations involving state affect generally were larger but not significantly different from those involving trait affect. Finally, the authors propose ideas for investigations at the primary-study level.
尽管近年来对个体情感/气质和组织公正的研究兴趣都大幅增长,但情感在组织公正认知中的作用却很少受到关注。在此,作者整合了这些文献,并使用元分析汇总效应量来检验状态情感(如情绪)、特质情感(如情感性)与组织公正变量之间的双变量关系。结果表明,状态和特质的积极与消极情感与分配公正、程序公正和互动公正的认知在预测方向上呈现出统计学上的显著关系,总体人群水平的平均相关系数绝对值范围从M(rho)=.09到M(rho)=.43。涉及状态情感的相关性通常更大,但与涉及特质情感的相关性没有显著差异。最后,作者提出了在原始研究层面进行调查的思路。