Croney C C, Millman S T
Department of Animal Sciences, Withycombe 112, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2007 Feb;85(2):556-65. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-422.
Concerns about farm animal welfare vary among individuals and societies. As people increasingly consider the values underlying current farm animal production methods, farm animal welfare policy debates have escalated. Recent food animal protection policies enacted in the European Union have fueled highly contentious discussions about the need for similar legislative activity in the United States. Policymakers and scientists in the United States are apprehensive about the scientific assessment, validation, and monitoring of animal welfare, as well as the unforeseen consequences of moving too hastily toward legislating farm animal welfare. The potential impact of such legislation on producers, food prices, animals, and concerned citizens must also be considered. Balancing the interests of all stakeholders has therefore presented a considerable challenge that has stymied US policymaking. In this review, we examine the roles of ethics and science in policy decisions, discuss how scientific knowledge relative to animal behavior has been incorporated into animal welfare policy, and identify opportunities for additional refinement of animal welfare science that may facilitate ethical and policy decisions about animal care.
人们对农场动物福利的关注在个人和社会之间存在差异。随着人们越来越多地思考当前农场动物生产方式背后的价值观,关于农场动物福利政策的辩论愈演愈烈。欧盟最近颁布的食用动物保护政策引发了关于美国是否需要类似立法活动的激烈讨论。美国的政策制定者和科学家对动物福利的科学评估、验证和监测,以及仓促立法规范农场动物福利可能产生的意外后果感到担忧。还必须考虑此类立法对生产者、食品价格、动物以及相关公民的潜在影响。因此,平衡所有利益相关者的利益构成了一项巨大挑战,阻碍了美国制定相关政策。在本综述中,我们探讨了伦理和科学在政策决策中的作用,讨论了与动物行为相关的科学知识如何被纳入动物福利政策,并确定了进一步完善动物福利科学的机会,这些机会可能有助于做出关于动物护理的伦理和政策决策。