Siegel Marilyn J, Hildebolt Charles F, Bae Kyongtae T, Hong Cheng, White Neil H
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Radiology. 2007 Mar;242(3):846-56. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2423060111. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
To prospectively correlate single- and multisection magnetic resonance (MR) imaging measurements with clinical measurements for assessment of abdominal adipose tissue volumes in healthy (control subjects), overweight, and diabetic overweight preadolescents and adolescents.
The study was approved by the institutional internal review board and was HIPAA compliant. Informed consent was obtained from parents, and assent was obtained from control subjects and patients. Thirty total study subjects (20 male, 10 female; age range, 10-18 years; mean, 14.5 years) underwent MR imaging, anthropometric measurement, and dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). A computer-assisted software program was used to quantify subcutaneous, visceral, and total abdominal adipose tissue volumes. Single-section measurements at disk space L4-L5 and whole-abdominal multisection measurements were compared, and each method was tested for correlations with anthropometric and DXA measurements with Spearman rho and Pearson correlation (r) coefficients. Single- and multisection image analyses required 5 and 25 minutes per subject, respectively.
There was a high degree of correlation between single- and multisection MR imaging methods for measurement of subcutaneous (r = 0.97), visceral (r = 0.96), and total abdominal fat (r = 0.97). MR imaging fat measurements strongly correlated with anthropometric measurements (rho correlation range, 0.81-0.96; P <or= .02), with overlapping 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for single- and multisection MR imaging correlations. MR imaging percentage of intraabdominal fat measurements (mean, 23%; 95% CI: 17%, 29%) highly correlated with DXA abdominal fat measurements (mean, 26%; 95% CI: 21%, 31%). Significant differences were found among healthy subjects, overweight patients, and diabetic overweight patients for total fat volumes (P < .001) but not for fat distribution patterns.
Single- and multisection MR imaging measurements for the quantitative assessment of abdominal adipose tissue strongly correlate with clinical and DXA fat measurements.
前瞻性地比较单层面和多层面磁共振成像(MR)测量结果与临床测量结果,以评估健康(对照受试者)、超重以及糖尿病超重的青春期前和青少年的腹部脂肪组织体积。
本研究经机构内部审查委员会批准,并符合健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)。获得了家长的知情同意,并获得了对照受试者和患者的同意。共有30名研究对象(20名男性,10名女性;年龄范围10 - 18岁;平均14.5岁)接受了MR成像、人体测量和双能X线吸收法(DXA)检查。使用计算机辅助软件程序对皮下、内脏和腹部总脂肪组织体积进行量化。比较了L4 - L5椎间盘间隙的单层面测量结果和全腹部多层面测量结果,并使用Spearman秩相关系数和Pearson相关系数(r)检验每种方法与人体测量和DXA测量结果的相关性。单层面和多层面图像分析分别每位受试者需要5分钟和25分钟。
单层面和多层面MR成像方法在测量皮下脂肪(r = 0.97)、内脏脂肪(r = 0.96)和腹部总脂肪(r = 0.97)方面具有高度相关性。MR成像脂肪测量结果与人体测量结果高度相关(rho相关范围为0.81 - 0.96;P≤0.02),单层面和多层面MR成像相关性的95%置信区间(CI)重叠。MR成像腹内脂肪测量百分比(平均23%;95%CI:17%,29%)与DXA腹部脂肪测量结果(平均26%;95%CI:21%,31%)高度相关。在健康受试者、超重患者和糖尿病超重患者之间,总脂肪体积存在显著差异(P < 0.001),但脂肪分布模式无显著差异。
用于定量评估腹部脂肪组织的单层面和多层面MR成像测量结果与临床和DXA脂肪测量结果密切相关。