Rosenstock Julio, Baron Michelle A, Dejager Sylvie, Mills David, Schweizer Anja
Dallas Diabetes and Endocrine Center at Medical City, 7777 Forest Lane, Dallas, TX 75230, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2007 Feb;30(2):217-23. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1815.
To compare the efficacy and tolerability of vildagliptin and rosiglitazone during a 24-week treatment in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.
This was a double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study of 24-week treatment with vildagliptin (100 mg daily, given as equally divided doses; n = 519) or rosiglitazone (8 mg daily, given as a once-daily dose; n = 267).
Monotherapy with vildagliptin and rosiglitazone decreased A1C (baseline = 8.7%) to a similar extent during the 24-week treatment, with most of the A1C reduction achieved by weeks 12 and 16, respectively. At end point, vildagliptin was as effective as rosiglitazone, improving A1C by -1.1 +/- 0.1% (P < 0.001) and -1.3 +/- 0.1% (P < 0.001), respectively, meeting the statistical criterion for noninferiority (upper-limit 95% CI for between-treatment difference < or =0.4%). Fasting plasma glucose decreased more with rosiglitazone (-2.3 mmol/l) than with vildagliptin (-1.3 mmol/l). Body weight did not change in vildagliptin-treated patients (-0.3 +/- 0.2 kg) but increased in rosiglitazone-treated patients (+1.6 +/- 0.3 kg, P < 0.001 vs. vildagliptin). Relative to rosiglitazone, vildagliptin significantly decreased triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL, non-HDL, and total-to-HDL cholesterol (-9 to -16%, all P < or = 0.01) but produced a smaller increase in HDL cholesterol (+4 vs. +9%, P = 0.003). The proportion of patients experiencing an adverse event was 61.4 vs. 64.0% in patients receiving vildagliptin and rosiglitazone, respectively. Only one mild hypoglycemic episode was experienced by one patient in each treatment group, while the incidence of edema was greater with rosiglitazone (4.1%) than vildagliptin (2.1%).
Vildagliptin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option in patients with type 2 diabetes, demonstrating similar glycemic reductions as rosiglitazone but without weight gain.
比较维格列汀与罗格列酮在初治2型糖尿病患者24周治疗期间的疗效和耐受性。
这是一项双盲、随机、活性药物对照、平行组、多中心研究,对维格列汀(每日100mg,分等量剂量给药;n = 519)或罗格列酮(每日8mg,单次给药;n = 267)进行24周治疗。
在24周治疗期间,维格列汀和罗格列酮单药治疗使糖化血红蛋白(A1C,基线值 = 8.7%)降低程度相似,大部分A1C降低分别在第12周和第16周实现。在研究终点,维格列汀与罗格列酮疗效相当,分别使A1C改善-1.1±0.1%(P < 0.001)和-1.3±0.1%(P < 0.001),达到非劣效性的统计标准(治疗组间差异的95%CI上限≤0.4%)。罗格列酮使空腹血糖降低幅度(-2.3mmol/L)大于维格列汀(-1.3mmol/L)。维格列汀治疗的患者体重未改变(-0.3±0.2kg),而罗格列酮治疗的患者体重增加(+1.6±0.3kg,与维格列汀相比P < 0.001)。与罗格列酮相比,维格列汀显著降低甘油三酯、总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白、非高密度脂蛋白以及总胆固醇与高密度脂蛋白的比值(降低9%至16%,均P≤0.01),但使高密度脂蛋白胆固醇升高幅度较小(分别为+4%和+9%,P = 0.003)。接受维格列汀和罗格列酮治疗的患者发生不良事件的比例分别为61.4%和64.0%。每个治疗组各有1例患者发生1次轻度低血糖事件,而罗格列酮组水肿发生率(4.1%)高于维格列汀组(2.1%)。
维格列汀是2型糖尿病患者有效且耐受性良好的治疗选择,降糖效果与罗格列酮相似,但不会导致体重增加。