Suppr超能文献

维格列汀与罗格列酮单药治疗2型糖尿病患者的比较:一项为期24周的双盲随机试验。

Comparison of vildagliptin and rosiglitazone monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, double-blind, randomized trial.

作者信息

Rosenstock Julio, Baron Michelle A, Dejager Sylvie, Mills David, Schweizer Anja

机构信息

Dallas Diabetes and Endocrine Center at Medical City, 7777 Forest Lane, Dallas, TX 75230, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2007 Feb;30(2):217-23. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1815.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of vildagliptin and rosiglitazone during a 24-week treatment in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study of 24-week treatment with vildagliptin (100 mg daily, given as equally divided doses; n = 519) or rosiglitazone (8 mg daily, given as a once-daily dose; n = 267).

RESULTS

Monotherapy with vildagliptin and rosiglitazone decreased A1C (baseline = 8.7%) to a similar extent during the 24-week treatment, with most of the A1C reduction achieved by weeks 12 and 16, respectively. At end point, vildagliptin was as effective as rosiglitazone, improving A1C by -1.1 +/- 0.1% (P < 0.001) and -1.3 +/- 0.1% (P < 0.001), respectively, meeting the statistical criterion for noninferiority (upper-limit 95% CI for between-treatment difference < or =0.4%). Fasting plasma glucose decreased more with rosiglitazone (-2.3 mmol/l) than with vildagliptin (-1.3 mmol/l). Body weight did not change in vildagliptin-treated patients (-0.3 +/- 0.2 kg) but increased in rosiglitazone-treated patients (+1.6 +/- 0.3 kg, P < 0.001 vs. vildagliptin). Relative to rosiglitazone, vildagliptin significantly decreased triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL, non-HDL, and total-to-HDL cholesterol (-9 to -16%, all P < or = 0.01) but produced a smaller increase in HDL cholesterol (+4 vs. +9%, P = 0.003). The proportion of patients experiencing an adverse event was 61.4 vs. 64.0% in patients receiving vildagliptin and rosiglitazone, respectively. Only one mild hypoglycemic episode was experienced by one patient in each treatment group, while the incidence of edema was greater with rosiglitazone (4.1%) than vildagliptin (2.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Vildagliptin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option in patients with type 2 diabetes, demonstrating similar glycemic reductions as rosiglitazone but without weight gain.

摘要

目的

比较维格列汀与罗格列酮在初治2型糖尿病患者24周治疗期间的疗效和耐受性。

研究设计与方法

这是一项双盲、随机、活性药物对照、平行组、多中心研究,对维格列汀(每日100mg,分等量剂量给药;n = 519)或罗格列酮(每日8mg,单次给药;n = 267)进行24周治疗。

结果

在24周治疗期间,维格列汀和罗格列酮单药治疗使糖化血红蛋白(A1C,基线值 = 8.7%)降低程度相似,大部分A1C降低分别在第12周和第16周实现。在研究终点,维格列汀与罗格列酮疗效相当,分别使A1C改善-1.1±0.1%(P < 0.001)和-1.3±0.1%(P < 0.001),达到非劣效性的统计标准(治疗组间差异的95%CI上限≤0.4%)。罗格列酮使空腹血糖降低幅度(-2.3mmol/L)大于维格列汀(-1.3mmol/L)。维格列汀治疗的患者体重未改变(-0.3±0.2kg),而罗格列酮治疗的患者体重增加(+1.6±0.3kg,与维格列汀相比P < 0.001)。与罗格列酮相比,维格列汀显著降低甘油三酯、总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白、非高密度脂蛋白以及总胆固醇与高密度脂蛋白的比值(降低9%至16%,均P≤0.01),但使高密度脂蛋白胆固醇升高幅度较小(分别为+4%和+9%,P = 0.003)。接受维格列汀和罗格列酮治疗的患者发生不良事件的比例分别为61.4%和64.0%。每个治疗组各有1例患者发生1次轻度低血糖事件,而罗格列酮组水肿发生率(4.1%)高于维格列汀组(2.1%)。

结论

维格列汀是2型糖尿病患者有效且耐受性良好的治疗选择,降糖效果与罗格列酮相似,但不会导致体重增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验