Maney Miriam, Tseng Chin-Lin, Safford Monika M, Miller Donald R, Pogach Leonard M
VA HSR&D Center for Healthcare Knowledge Management Research, VA New Jersey Healthcare System, 385 Tremont Avenue, East Orange, NJ, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2007 Feb;30(2):245-51. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0771.
The purpose of this article was to evaluate the impact of self-reported patient factors on quality assessment of Veterans Health Administration medical centers in achieving glycemic control.
We linked survey data and administrative records for veterans who self-reported diabetes on a 1999 national weighted survey. Linear regression models were used to adjust A1C levels in fiscal year 2000 for socioeconomic status (education level, employment, and concerns of having enough food), social support (marital status and living alone), health behaviors (smoking, alcohol use, and exercise level), physical and mental health status, BMI, and diabetes duration. Medical centers were ranked by deciles, with and without adjustment for patient characteristics, on proportions of patients achieving A1C <7 or <8%.
There was substantial medical center level variation in patient characteristics of the 56,740 individuals from 105 centers, e.g., grade school education (mean 15.3% [range 2.3-32.7%]), being retired (38.3% [19.9-59.7%]) or married (65.2% [43.7-77.8%]), food insufficiency (13.9% [7.2-24.6%]), and no reported exercise (43.2% [31.1-53.6%]). The final model had an R(2) of 7.8%. The Spearman rank coefficient comparing the thresholds adjusted only for age and sex to the full model was 0.71 for <7% and 0.64 for <8% (P < 0.0001). After risk adjustment, 4 of the 11 best-performing centers changed at least two deciles for the <7% threshold, and 2 of 11 changed two deciles for the <8% threshold.
Adjustment for patient self-reported socioeconomic status and health impacts medical center rankings for glycemic control, suggesting the need for risk adjustment to assure valid inferences about quality.
本文旨在评估患者自我报告的因素对退伍军人健康管理局医疗中心实现血糖控制质量评估的影响。
我们将1999年全国加权调查中自我报告患有糖尿病的退伍军人的调查数据与行政记录相链接。使用线性回归模型针对社会经济状况(教育水平、就业情况以及对食物充足性的担忧)、社会支持(婚姻状况和独居情况)、健康行为(吸烟、饮酒和运动水平)、身心健康状况、体重指数(BMI)以及糖尿病病程,对2000财年的糖化血红蛋白(A1C)水平进行调整。根据患者达到A1C<7%或<8%的比例,在有无对患者特征进行调整的情况下,将医疗中心按十分位数进行排名。
来自105个中心的56740名个体的患者特征在医疗中心层面存在显著差异,例如小学教育程度(平均15.3%[范围2.3 - 32.7%])、退休(38.3%[19.9 - 59.7%])或已婚(65.2%[43.7 - 77.8%])、食物不足(13.9%[7.2 - 24.6%])以及未报告进行运动(43.2%[31.1 - 53.6%])。最终模型的决定系数R²为7.8%。仅针对年龄和性别进行调整的阈值与完整模型相比,对于<7%的情况,Spearman等级系数为0.71,对于<8%的情况为0.64(P<0.0001)。经过风险调整后,11个表现最佳的中心中有4个在<7%阈值下至少变动了两个十分位数,11个中有2个在<8%阈值下变动了两个十分位数。
对患者自我报告的社会经济状况和健康状况进行调整会影响医疗中心血糖控制的排名,这表明需要进行风险调整以确保对质量做出有效的推断。