Suppr超能文献

医学实践和医学研究中经济利益冲突的监管:一个在寻找问题的有害解决方案。

Regulation of financial conflicts of interest in medical practice and medical research: a damaging solution in search of a problem.

作者信息

Stossel Thomas P

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Perspect Biol Med. 2007 Winter;50(1):54-71. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2007.0011.

Abstract

The free market, which includes most practicing physicians, publicly supported biomedical researchers, and private drug and device companies, has succeeded spectacularly in delivering new medical technologies to the public. Increased interactions between doctors (physicians and biomedical researchers), epitomized by the founding of the biotechnology revolution, have and can continue to accelerate this delivery. A powerful anti-commercial advocacy movement that has blossomed over the past 20 years threatens this momentum. This movement has succeeded in inverting reality by demonizing the market and by promoting distorted and damaging views of professionalism and of science. Most ominously, it has imposed onerous and counterproductive regulations on medical education and translational research.

摘要

自由市场,其中包括大多数执业医生、得到公众支持的生物医学研究人员以及私营药品和器械公司,在向公众提供新的医疗技术方面取得了巨大成功。以生物技术革命的兴起为代表,医生(内科医生和生物医学研究人员)之间日益增加的互动已经并能够继续加速这一进程。在过去20年里蓬勃发展的一股强大的反商业倡导运动威胁到了这一势头。这场运动通过妖魔化市场以及宣扬对专业精神和科学的扭曲及有害观点成功地颠倒了现实。最不祥的是,它对医学教育和转化研究施加了繁重且适得其反的规定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验