Suppr超能文献

GDx VCC扫描激光偏振仪与Stratus光学相干断层扫描仪在检测视神经带状萎缩中的比较。

Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter and the stratus optical coherence tomograph in the detection of band atrophy of the optic nerve.

作者信息

Monteiro M L R, Moura F C

机构信息

Neuro-ophthalmology Service, Hospital das Clínicas of the University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2008 May;22(5):641-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702694. Epub 2007 Jan 26.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the ability of scanning laser polarimeter (SLP) with variable corneal compensation (GDx VCC) and optical coherence tomograph (Stratus OCT) to discriminate between eyes with band atrophy (BA) of the optic nerve and healthy eyes.

METHODS

The study included 37 eyes with BA and temporal visual field (VF) defects from chiasmal compression, and 29 normal eyes. Subjects underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP) and retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) scans using GDx VCC and Stratus OCT. The severity of the VF defects was evaluated by the temporal mean defect (TMD), calculated as the average of 22 values of the temporal total deviation plot on SAP. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the relationship between RNFL thickness parameters and the TMD.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between the ROC curves areas (AUCs) for the GDx VCC and Stratus OCT with regard to average RNFL thickness (0.98 and 0.99, respectively) and the superior (0.94; 0.95), inferior (0.96; 0.97), and nasal (0.92; 0.96) quadrants. However, the AUC in the temporal quadrant (0.77) was significantly smaller (P<0.001) with GDx VCC than with Stratus OCT (0.98). Lower TMD values were associated with smaller RNFL thickness in most parameters from both equipments.

CONCLUSION

Adding VCC resulted in improved performance in SLP when evaluating eyes with BA, and both technologies are sensitive in detecting average, superior, inferior, and nasal quadrant RNFL loss. However, GDx VCC still poorly discriminates RNFL loss in the temporal quadrant when compared with Stratus OCT.

摘要

目的

比较具有可变角膜补偿功能的扫描激光偏振仪(GDx VCC)和光学相干断层扫描仪(Stratus OCT)区分视神经带状萎缩(BA)眼和健康眼的能力。

方法

该研究纳入了37只因视交叉受压导致BA和颞侧视野(VF)缺损的眼睛,以及29只正常眼睛。受试者接受了标准自动视野计(SAP)检查,并使用GDx VCC和Stratus OCT进行视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)扫描。通过颞侧平均缺损(TMD)评估VF缺损的严重程度,TMD计算为SAP上颞侧总偏差图22个值的平均值。计算受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。使用Pearson相关系数评估RNFL厚度参数与TMD之间的关系。

结果

在平均RNFL厚度(分别为0.98和0.99)以及上象限(0.94;0.95)、下象限(0.96;0.97)和鼻象限(0.92;0.96)方面,GDx VCC和Stratus OCT的ROC曲线面积(AUC)之间未发现显著差异。然而,GDx VCC在颞象限的AUC(0.77)显著小于Stratus OCT(0.98)(P<0.001)。两种设备的大多数参数中,较低的TMD值与较小的RNFL厚度相关。

结论

在评估BA眼时,增加可变角膜补偿功能可提高扫描激光偏振仪的性能,两种技术在检测平均、上、下和鼻象限RNFL损失方面均很敏感。然而,与Stratus OCT相比,GDx VCC在颞象限仍难以区分RNFL损失。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验