Suppr超能文献

采用交叉螺钉固定与前路塑形钢板加交叉螺钉固定进行踝关节融合术的对比研究。

Comparative study of ankle arthrodesis using cross screw fixation versus anterior contoured plate plus cross screw fixation.

作者信息

Kakarala Gopikrishna, Rajan Daniel T

机构信息

King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Belg. 2006 Dec;72(6):716-21.

Abstract

Arthrodesis of the ankle joint is still the traditional treatment for symptomatic osteoarthritis. This comparative study was done to assess the functional outcome of open ankle fusion using either cross screw fixation (group A) or anterior contoured plate and cross screw fixation (group B) in a consecutive series of 22 patients. All the patients had the same inclusion criteria. All the patients in both groups underwent the same operative technique and were operated by the same surgeon. Mean follow-up was 26.8 months. The mean time to fusion was 18.8 weeks in group A and 16.8 weeks in group B (p = 0.046). The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle and Hind foot score at the final follow-up was 79 in group A and 86 in group B (p = 0.23). Two patients in group A that went to non-union required re-arthrodesis using contoured plate and cross screw fixation; both attained eventual union. We conclude that anterior contoured plate plus cross screw fixation is a simple and reproducible technique for ankle arthrodesis that gives stable internal fixation and excellent clinical results.

摘要

踝关节融合术仍是有症状的骨关节炎的传统治疗方法。本比较研究旨在评估在连续的22例患者中,采用交叉螺钉固定(A组)或前路塑形钢板加交叉螺钉固定(B组)进行开放性踝关节融合术的功能结果。所有患者具有相同的纳入标准。两组所有患者均采用相同的手术技术,且由同一位外科医生进行手术。平均随访时间为26.8个月。A组平均融合时间为18.8周,B组为16.8周(p = 0.046)。末次随访时,A组美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)踝关节与后足评分平均为79分,B组为86分(p = 0.23)。A组中有2例发生骨不连的患者需要采用塑形钢板加交叉螺钉固定进行再次关节融合术;二者最终均实现了骨愈合。我们得出结论,前路塑形钢板加交叉螺钉固定是一种简单且可重复的踝关节融合术技术,能提供稳定的内固定并取得优异的临床效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验