Timmers G J, Simoons-Smit A M, Leidekker M E, Janssen J J W M, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C M J E, Huijgens P C
Department of Haematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007 May;13(5):497-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01684.x. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
An open-label randomised clinical trial was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin plus phenethicillin for the prevention of bacterial infections in patients with high-risk neutropenia, and to monitor the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Adult patients (n = 242) scheduled to receive intensive treatment for haematological malignancies were assigned randomly to receive oral prophylaxis with either levofloxacin 500 mg once-daily (n = 122), or ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice-daily plus phenethicillin 250 mg four-times-daily (n = 120). The primary endpoint was failure of prophylaxis, defined as the first occurrence of either the need to change the prophylactic regimen or the initiation of intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics. This endpoint was observed in 89 (73.0%) of 122 levofloxacin recipients and in 85 (70.8%) of 120 ciprofloxacin plus phenethicillin recipients (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.88-1.21, p 0.71). No differences were noted between the two groups with respect to secondary outcome measures, including time to endpoint, occurrence of fever, type and number of microbiologically documented infections, and administration of intravenous antibiotics. A questionnaire revealed that levofloxacin was tolerated significantly better than ciprofloxacin plus phenethicillin. Surveillance cultures indicated the emergence of viridans group (VG) streptococci resistant to levofloxacin in 17 (14%) of 122 levofloxacin recipients; in these cases, the prophylactic regimen was adjusted. No bacteraemia with VG streptococci occurred. It was concluded that levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin plus phenethicillin are equally effective in the prevention of bacterial infections in neutropenic patients, but that levofloxacin is tolerated better. Emergence of levofloxacin-resistant VG streptococci is of concern, but appears to be a manageable problem.
一项开放标签的随机临床试验旨在比较左氧氟沙星以及环丙沙星联合青霉素对高危中性粒细胞减少症患者预防细菌感染的疗效和耐受性,并监测抗菌药物耐药性的出现。计划接受血液系统恶性肿瘤强化治疗的成年患者(n = 242)被随机分配接受口服预防用药,其中一组为每日一次口服500 mg左氧氟沙星(n = 122),另一组为每日两次口服500 mg环丙沙星加每日四次口服250 mg青霉素(n = 120)。主要终点是预防失败,定义为首次出现需要改变预防方案或开始静脉注射广谱抗生素的情况。122名接受左氧氟沙星治疗的患者中有89名(73.0%)出现了该终点,120名接受环丙沙星加青霉素治疗的患者中有85名(70.8%)出现了该终点(相对危险度1.03,95%置信区间0.88 - 1.21,p = 0.71)。两组在次要结局指标方面没有差异, 这些指标包括达到终点的时间、发热的发生情况、微生物学确诊感染的类型和数量以及静脉注射抗生素的使用情况。一份调查问卷显示,左氧氟沙星的耐受性明显优于环丙沙星加青霉素。监测培养表明,122名接受左氧氟沙星治疗的患者中有17名(14%)出现了对左氧氟沙星耐药的草绿色链球菌;在这些病例中,调整了预防方案。未发生草绿色链球菌菌血症。研究得出结论,左氧氟沙星以及环丙沙星联合青霉素在预防中性粒细胞减少症患者细菌感染方面同样有效,但左氧氟沙星的耐受性更好。对左氧氟沙星耐药的草绿色链球菌的出现令人担忧,但似乎是一个可控的问题。