Umar Mohammed A, Yamashita Kazuto, Kushiro Tokiko, Muir William W
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido 069-8501, Japan.
Am J Vet Res. 2007 Feb;68(2):121-7. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.68.2.121.
To evaluate the cardiovascular effects of total IV anesthesia with propofol (P-TIVA) or ketamine-medetomidine-propofol (KMP-TIVA) in horses.
5 Thoroughbreds.
Horses were anesthetized twice for 4 hours, once with P-TIVA and once with KMP-TIVA. Horses were medicated with medetomidine (0.005 mg/kg, IV) and anesthetized with ketamine (2.5 mg/kg, IV) and midazolam (0.04 mg/kg, IV). After receiving a loading dose of propofol (0.5 mg/kg, IV), anesthesia was maintained with a constant rate infusion of propofol (0.22 mg/kg/min) for P-TIVA or with a constant rate infusion of propofol (0.14 mg/kg/min), ketamine (1 mg/kg/h), and medetomidine (0.00125 mg/kg/h) for KMP-TIVA. Ventilation was artificially controlled throughout anesthesia. Cardiovascular measurements were determined before medication and every 30 minutes during anesthesia, and recovery from anesthesia was scored.
Cardiovascular function was maintained within acceptable limits during P-TIVA and KMP-TIVA. Heart rate ranged from 30 to 40 beats/min, and mean arterial blood pressure was > 90 mm Hg in all horses during anesthesia. Heart rate was lower in horses anesthetized with KMP-TIVA, compared with P-TIVA. Cardiac index decreased significantly, reaching minimum values (65% of baseline values) at 90 minutes during KMP-TIVA, whereas cardiac index was maintained between 80% and 90% of baseline values during P-TIVA. Stroke volume and systemic vascular resistance were similarly maintained during both methods of anesthesia. With P-TIVA, some spontaneous limb movements occurred, whereas with KMP-TIVA, no movements were observed.
Cardiovascular measurements remained within acceptable values in artificially ventilated horses during P-TIVA or KMP-TIVA. Decreased cardiac output associated with KMP-TIVA was primarily the result of decreases in heart rate.
评估丙泊酚全静脉麻醉(P-TIVA)或氯胺酮-美托咪定-丙泊酚全静脉麻醉(KMP-TIVA)对马的心血管影响。
5匹纯种马。
对马进行两次4小时的麻醉,一次采用P-TIVA,一次采用KMP-TIVA。给马注射美托咪定(0.005 mg/kg,静脉注射),并用氯胺酮(2.5 mg/kg,静脉注射)和咪达唑仑(0.04 mg/kg,静脉注射)进行麻醉。在接受丙泊酚负荷剂量(0.5 mg/kg,静脉注射)后,P-TIVA组通过持续输注丙泊酚(0.22 mg/kg/min)维持麻醉,KMP-TIVA组通过持续输注丙泊酚(0.14 mg/kg/min)、氯胺酮(1 mg/kg/h)和美托咪定(0.00125 mg/kg/h)维持麻醉。在整个麻醉过程中人工控制通气。在用药前以及麻醉期间每30分钟测定心血管指标,并对麻醉苏醒情况进行评分。
在P-TIVA和KMP-TIVA期间,心血管功能维持在可接受范围内。所有马匹在麻醉期间心率范围为30至40次/分钟,平均动脉血压>90 mmHg。与P-TIVA相比,采用KMP-TIVA麻醉的马匹心率较低。心脏指数显著下降,在KMP-TIVA期间90分钟时降至最低值(基线值的65%),而在P-TIVA期间心脏指数维持在基线值的80%至90%之间。在两种麻醉方法中,每搏量和全身血管阻力均得到类似维持。采用P-TIVA时,出现了一些肢体自发运动,而采用KMP-TIVA时未观察到运动。
在人工通气的马匹中,P-TIVA或KMP-TIVA期间心血管指标保持在可接受值范围内。与KMP-TIVA相关的心输出量降低主要是心率下降的结果。