Suppr超能文献

卫生服务研究的定性数据分析:构建分类法、主题和理论。

Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.

作者信息

Bradley Elizabeth H, Curry Leslie A, Devers Kelly J

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06520-8034, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1758-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide practical strategies for conducting and evaluating analyses of qualitative data applicable for health services researchers. DATA SOURCES AND DESIGN: We draw on extant qualitative methodological literature to describe practical approaches to qualitative data analysis. Approaches to data analysis vary by discipline and analytic tradition; however, we focus on qualitative data analysis that has as a goal the generation of taxonomy, themes, and theory germane to health services research.

PRINCIPLE FINDINGS

We describe an approach to qualitative data analysis that applies the principles of inductive reasoning while also employing predetermined code types to guide data analysis and interpretation. These code types (conceptual, relationship, perspective, participant characteristics, and setting codes) define a structure that is appropriate for generation of taxonomy, themes, and theory. Conceptual codes and subcodes facilitate the development of taxonomies. Relationship and perspective codes facilitate the development of themes and theory. Intersectional analyses with data coded for participant characteristics and setting codes can facilitate comparative analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative inquiry can improve the description and explanation of complex, real-world phenomena pertinent to health services research. Greater understanding of the processes of qualitative data analysis can be helpful for health services researchers as they use these methods themselves or collaborate with qualitative researchers from a wide range of disciplines.

摘要

目的

为健康服务研究人员提供进行和评估定性数据分析的实用策略。

数据来源与设计

我们借鉴现有的定性方法文献来描述定性数据分析的实用方法。数据分析方法因学科和分析传统而异;然而,我们专注于以生成与健康服务研究相关的分类法、主题和理论为目标的定性数据分析。

主要发现

我们描述了一种定性数据分析方法,该方法应用归纳推理原则,同时采用预先确定的编码类型来指导数据分析和解释。这些编码类型(概念性、关系性、视角性、参与者特征性和情境编码)定义了一种适合生成分类法、主题和理论的结构。概念性编码和子编码有助于分类法的发展。关系性和视角性编码有助于主题和理论的发展。对编码为参与者特征和情境编码的数据进行交叉分析有助于比较分析。

结论

定性研究可以改进对与健康服务研究相关的复杂现实世界现象的描述和解释。更好地理解定性数据分析过程对健康服务研究人员会有所帮助,因为他们自己使用这些方法或与来自广泛学科的定性研究人员合作。

相似文献

1
Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.
Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1758-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x.
3
Qualitative and mixed methods in mental health services and implementation research.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2014;43(6):851-61. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.910791.
4
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
6
The role of theory in qualitative health research.
Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27(3):285-90. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp077. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
7
A Guide to Multisite Qualitative Analysis.
Qual Health Res. 2018 Oct;28(12):1969-1977. doi: 10.1177/1049732318786703. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
8
Using Grounded Theory Method to Capture and Analyze Health Care Experiences.
Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug;50(4):1195-210. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12275. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
9
A health researcher's guide to qualitative methodologies.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007 Oct;31(5):433-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00114.x.
10
A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.014. Epub 2006 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

3
Factors impacting informed decision-making for patients with pancreatic cancer: a qualitative study.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 30;33(9):825. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09878-9.
4
Clinician Needs and Requirements for a Decision Aid Navigator: Qualitative Study.
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 21;12:e69756. doi: 10.2196/69756.
5
Examining gender as an issue of policy priority: a case study of four Kenyan health policy implementation strategies.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 31;13:1615792. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1615792. eCollection 2025.
7
Evaluating Whole Health Engagement Among Homeless-Experienced Veterans in an Emergency Shelter: A Quality Improvement Study.
AJPM Focus. 2025 Jun 25;4(5):100383. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100383. eCollection 2025 Oct.
8
Innovation adoption, use and implementation in emergency departments during the COVID-19 pandemic.
BMJ Innov. 2024 Jul;10(3):51-59. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2023-001206. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
10
A qualitative study exploring patient experiences and opinions of warfarin patient self-management in the US healthcare system.
J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2024 Mar;7(3):198-206. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1912. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Parent-identified barriers to pediatric health care: a process-oriented model.
Health Serv Res. 2006 Feb;41(1):148-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00455.x.
4
From adversary to partner: have quality improvement organizations made the transition?
Health Serv Res. 2005 Apr;40(2):459-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00367.x.
6
Study design in qualitative research--2: Sampling and data collection strategies.
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2000;13(2):263-71. doi: 10.1080/13576280050074543.
7
Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Feb;41(2):141-50. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(03)00113-5.
8
9
Hospitals' negotiating leverage with health plans: how and why has it changed?
Health Serv Res. 2003 Feb;38(1 Pt 2):419-46. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00123.
10
Patients' and physicians' attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors.
JAMA. 2003 Feb 26;289(8):1001-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.8.1001.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验